Agree however scholarships aren't the end of recruiting any more.
Are we going to see any programs where the rosters will be reduced, on purpose. Nobody needs 100+ on a football roster so why spend the money for 100+. We have softball players leaving for playing time only to be replaced by players, freshman and older, who are looking for playing time. That's not solving any problem. Maybe football expenditure equal for 100 players if made for only 70 players VT could make a difference?
Thread Replies (10)
Sorry, I may have confused some
-- Slider!22
Jun 30, 2025 at 10:38 AM ET
Slider!22
•
06/30/25 10:38 AM ET
I'm all for Cheat wasting those softball schollies.**
-- IB4TECH
Jun 30, 2025 at 11:42 AM ET
IB4TECH
•
06/30/25 11:42 AM ET
There are more team members on baseball primarily due to
-- RJHokie
Jun 30, 2025 at 08:54 AM ET
RJHokie
•
06/30/25 08:54 AM ET
Yup, I'd think it's mostly a pitching staff thing as opposed to a gender
-- BG Hokie
Jun 30, 2025 at 10:15 AM ET
BG Hokie
•
06/30/25 10:15 AM ET
Softball deserves more than baseball
-- UpperQuad
Jun 30, 2025 at 02:00 AM ET
UpperQuad
•
06/30/25 02:00 AM ET
The truth is I suspect many of college coaches are fine with roster . . .
-- MidloHokie
Jun 30, 2025 at 10:14 PM ET
MidloHokie
•
06/30/25 10:14 PM ET
Baseball requires loads of pitchers.**
-- IB4TECH
Jun 30, 2025 at 11:40 AM ET
IB4TECH
•
06/30/25 11:40 AM ET
Softball starting pitchers can pitch each day but baseball starters every
-- Lakeridgehokie
Jun 30, 2025 at 12:36 PM ET
Lakeridgehokie
•
06/30/25 12:36 PM ET
Agree however scholarships aren't the end of recruiting any more.
◄
-- laphroaig
Jun 30, 2025 at 08:45 AM ET
laphroaig
•
06/30/25 08:45 AM ET