Joined:
12/13/2005
Posts:
48,083
Likes:
14,262
Here's the BUT: there is an interpretation that this "clearly out" only
applies if the runner has not yet begun to slide. Talking to NCAA officials/umpires today around the water cooler so to speak (text messages and Facebook in reality) it is this reason that they are saying it's a good obstruction call per the rules and interpretations.
Also, please note this would NOT be obstruction in high school (NFHS) and any youth sanctions I'm familiar with, notably (USA Softball and USSSA softball). I believe that the rule should come back in line with those rule sanctions and the college game would be better for it.
Thread Replies (20)
Hopefully the rules committee will modify the obstruction rule soon.
-- MidloHokie
May 30, 2025 at 06:41 AM ET
MidloHokie
•
05/30/25 06:41 AM ET
It feels like there is always a nickel and dime rule in softball that
-- GBOHokie
May 30, 2025 at 10:59 AM ET
GBOHokie
•
05/30/25 10:59 AM ET
Here's a pretty good article that advocates for a reasonable change
-- VTChip
May 30, 2025 at 10:49 AM ET
VTChip
•
05/30/25 10:49 AM ET
Good in theory, but the one issue I potentially see is
-- VTsportscaster
May 30, 2025 at 11:25 AM ET
VTsportscaster
•
05/30/25 11:25 AM ET
It's like they are reading from a different rule book!**
-- VT_AD
May 30, 2025 at 02:52 PM ET
VT_AD
•
05/30/25 02:52 PM ET
Here's the BUT: there is an interpretation that this "clearly out" only
◄
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 12:20 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 12:20 PM ET
Exactly. Once again IMO poor umpiring has forced over-legislation
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 12:11 PM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 12:11 PM ET
No, this is good umpiring but a bad rule, see my explanation above.**
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 12:21 PM ET
Good umpiring would eliminate the need for over-reaching on rules
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 03:39 PM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 03:39 PM ET
Maybe they need to expand #3, and further define
-- VTsportscaster
May 30, 2025 at 11:28 AM ET
VTsportscaster
•
05/30/25 11:28 AM ET
Agree, but I bet some coaches/folks will find fault with whatever they
-- RJHokie
May 30, 2025 at 11:30 AM ET
RJHokie
•
05/30/25 11:30 AM ET
Maybe but I'm not sure that's the case, either. I mean, the obstruction
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 01:32 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 01:32 PM ET
You hit the nail on the head. I watched both of those plays
-- WestEndHokie39
May 30, 2025 at 10:46 AM ET
WestEndHokie39
•
05/30/25 10:46 AM ET
Make it non reviewable. If you have to review it to call it, it probably
-- FriendofCoal
May 30, 2025 at 09:13 AM ET
FriendofCoal
•
05/30/25 09:13 AM ET
Too many judgement calls that umps get wrong
-- VAHokie89
May 30, 2025 at 10:27 AM ET
VAHokie89
•
05/30/25 10:27 AM ET
Absolutely; it’s sort of like Targeting in football
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 09:12 AM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 09:12 AM ET
Amen, preach on that, brother.
-- TomTurkey
May 30, 2025 at 09:30 AM ET
TomTurkey
•
05/30/25 09:30 AM ET
Agreed. I do feel there is legitimate obstruction.
-- GCHokieof91
May 30, 2025 at 09:03 AM ET
GCHokieof91
•
05/30/25 09:03 AM ET