Joined:
01/07/2016
Posts:
8,789
Likes:
11,404
Agreed. I do feel there is legitimate obstruction.
However, some of the obstructions called totally reverse the most likely outcome of the play and erase the good work that the defense did to get the likely out. Take the Ole Miss - Texas Tech play at 3rd base for instance. The runner at 3rd made a bone headed and ill advised dash for home plate as soon as the ball was hit. The defense made the proper read and threw home instead of throwing to first. But on the throw back to 3rd, just because the 3rd baseman had one foot that was partially blocking the base (which did not prevent the runner from getting a hand in), obstruction was called. I would argue that if the 3rd baseman positioned her feet in a different way, she would be off balance and at risk to fall. It’s just too much reward to the offense for screwing up in the first place.
Thread Replies (20)
Hopefully the rules committee will modify the obstruction rule soon.
-- MidloHokie
May 30, 2025 at 06:41 AM ET
MidloHokie
•
05/30/25 06:41 AM ET
It feels like there is always a nickel and dime rule in softball that
-- GBOHokie
May 30, 2025 at 10:59 AM ET
GBOHokie
•
05/30/25 10:59 AM ET
Here's a pretty good article that advocates for a reasonable change
-- VTChip
May 30, 2025 at 10:49 AM ET
VTChip
•
05/30/25 10:49 AM ET
Good in theory, but the one issue I potentially see is
-- VTsportscaster
May 30, 2025 at 11:25 AM ET
VTsportscaster
•
05/30/25 11:25 AM ET
It's like they are reading from a different rule book!**
-- VT_AD
May 30, 2025 at 02:52 PM ET
VT_AD
•
05/30/25 02:52 PM ET
Here's the BUT: there is an interpretation that this "clearly out" only
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 12:20 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 12:20 PM ET
Exactly. Once again IMO poor umpiring has forced over-legislation
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 12:11 PM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 12:11 PM ET
No, this is good umpiring but a bad rule, see my explanation above.**
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 12:21 PM ET
Good umpiring would eliminate the need for over-reaching on rules
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 03:39 PM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 03:39 PM ET
Maybe they need to expand #3, and further define
-- VTsportscaster
May 30, 2025 at 11:28 AM ET
VTsportscaster
•
05/30/25 11:28 AM ET
Agree, but I bet some coaches/folks will find fault with whatever they
-- RJHokie
May 30, 2025 at 11:30 AM ET
RJHokie
•
05/30/25 11:30 AM ET
Maybe but I'm not sure that's the case, either. I mean, the obstruction
-- BG Hokie
May 30, 2025 at 01:32 PM ET
BG Hokie
•
05/30/25 01:32 PM ET
You hit the nail on the head. I watched both of those plays
-- WestEndHokie39
May 30, 2025 at 10:46 AM ET
WestEndHokie39
•
05/30/25 10:46 AM ET
Make it non reviewable. If you have to review it to call it, it probably
-- FriendofCoal
May 30, 2025 at 09:13 AM ET
FriendofCoal
•
05/30/25 09:13 AM ET
Too many judgement calls that umps get wrong
-- VAHokie89
May 30, 2025 at 10:27 AM ET
VAHokie89
•
05/30/25 10:27 AM ET
Absolutely; it’s sort of like Targeting in football
-- hokiepro
May 30, 2025 at 09:12 AM ET
hokiepro
•
05/30/25 09:12 AM ET
Amen, preach on that, brother.
-- TomTurkey
May 30, 2025 at 09:30 AM ET
TomTurkey
•
05/30/25 09:30 AM ET
Agreed. I do feel there is legitimate obstruction.
◄
-- GCHokieof91
May 30, 2025 at 09:03 AM ET
GCHokieof91
•
05/30/25 09:03 AM ET