All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Jasonh Jasonh OP
Sep 01, 2023 at 08:36 AM ET
How munch more money will the ACC schools get
With the addition of the new schools how much more money will the ACC schools get? Might as well add UCON.

11 Replies

KaHOOnah KaHOOnah
I'm not sure the ACCN dollars are worked out, but I think it's around $3mn
per school per year based. That's something, better than nothing, but it's probably not going to move the needle too much if we're staring down the barrel of a $30mn shortfall annually. The ACC is unrecognizable at this point. Just kill it with fire already
wwhokie1 wwhokie1
And that extra goes away in a few years.
C
Colonel Jessup
Yep. This move officially signals the end of any ACC loyalty
E
EDGEMAN
UCONN would have made more sense than adding those three
And UCONN would be a crappy addition.
BROman Hokie BROman Hokie
CA/TX will have more ACCN subs than CT’s entire population…
and CA/TX ACCN subscribers flip to in-market, which is somewhere around $1 more per sub per month. And the ACCN is on the same tier as SECN in TX, so if you want one, you’re paying for the other.
V
VTCALS72
This is a bad thing IMHO
But I do believe the ACC has seen the handwriting on the wall of the separation of the "pro" division and there is nothing the ACC can do about it. So it is just grab as much money for the league as they can as long as they can. Then when there actually is something they can be proactive on they will have a nice little war chest to accomplish it.
HokieAl HokieAl
Agree. This is about the ACC surviving after the split
It could be 15 years from now, but it will happen in some form. The ACC clearly wanted to wait longer but was forced to act now. Oh well, it's done. Now we just need WSU and ORST to get their final home so that the playoff changes can be discussed again.
C
Colonel Jessup
Accumulating small fanbases in remote areas
creating no logical footprint is a poor strategy for survival, IMO. You will have to pay these schools full shares before you know it and go to the negotiating table with these anchors. Looking at B12 post their agreement would be a better strategy. WVU, Cincy, and going west some into Texas perhaps. But definitely not poor draws in Cali. Does it matter the ACC survives due to sheer numbers in the future? This isn’t the “ACC” at all. Who is fighting for that other than schools who feel lucky to be in it?
V
VTCALS72
No one said that these 3 schools would survive as ACC members in the
"New college division." For these 3 it is a short term situation to ride out the next several years. I also believe that the "new college division will break up the mega B12 into something like 8-12 team regional conferences. My guess as to what is out there today, of the now 18 teams, Clemson, FSU, Miami, ND and UNC are definitely in for the pro division. VT, NCSU and UVA and even possibly GT could be included. Stanford, Cal and SMU will be spun off into a west coach equivalent of the "new ACC" So Cuse, BC, PItt, Duke, Wake, Lville, and whatever of VT, NCSU,UVA and GT would have a couple of other maybe current G5 teams to it to form a regional conference reaching from Cuse to GT. Just a guess.
C
Colonel Jessup
The “survival” of the ACC in a sub-division
Is immaterial. It simply won’t matter to VT as the ACC won’t be the ACC it joined. It will find the best grouping of schools it can. These three new schools do nothing for me in terms of ACC stability. It actually does the opposite of that longterm if P2 continues on. B12 would swallow up any ACC properties worth having.
E
EDGEMAN
Mountain West?