All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTHokie2000
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 41,416
Likes: 17,028

They are both guilty of the same crime which is a violation of the bylaws.

10.3 Sports Wagering Activities. [#] The following individuals shall not knowingly participate in sports wagering activities or provide information to individuals involved in or associated with any type of sports wagering activities concerning intercollegiate, amateur or professional athletics competition: (Adopted: 4/26/07 effective 8/1/07) (a) Staff members of an institution's athletics department; (b) Nonathletics department staff members who have responsibilities within or over the athletics department (e.g., chancellor or president, faculty athletics representative, individual to whom athletics reports); (c) Staff members of a conference office; and (d) Student-athletes. 10.3.1 Scope of Application. [#] The prohibition against sports wagering applies to any institutional practice or any competition (intercollegiate, amateur or professional) in a sport in which the Association conducts championship competition, in bowl subdivision football and in emerging sports for women. (Adopted: 4/26/07 effective 8/1/07) 8/30/25 25 10.3.1.1 Exception. [#] The provisions of Bylaw 10.3 are not applicable to traditional wagers between institutions (e.g., traditional rivalry) or in conjunction with particular contests (e.g., bowl games). Items wagered must be representative of the involved institutions or the states in which they are located. (Adopted: 4/26/07 effective 8/1/07) 12.5.2.1 Content and Purpose. Before participation in intercollegiate competition each academic year, a student-athlete shall sign a statement in a form prescribed by the Legislative Committee in which the student-athlete submits information related to eligibility, recruitment, financial aid, previous positive-drug tests administered by any other athletics organization and involvement in organized gambling activities related to intercollegiate or professional athletics competition under the governing legislation. Failure to complete and sign the statement shall result in the student-athlete's ineligibility for participation in all intercollegiate competition. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a student-athlete's eligibility if the violation occurred due to an institutional administrative error or oversight, and the student-athlete subsequently signs the form; however, the violation shall be considered an institutional violation per Bylaw 8.01.3. (Revised: 1/10/92 effective 8/1/92, 1/14/97, 2/19/97, 4/24/03, 11/1/07 effective 8/1/08, 8/7/14, 10/4/17, 6/6/25 effective 7/1/25) 8.01.3 Responsibility to Monitor and Report. An institution shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the Association in the conduct of its intercollegiate athletics programs. It shall monitor its programs to ensure compliance and to identify and report instances in which compliance has not been achieved. An institution shall cooperate fully with any enforcement efforts and shall take appropriate corrective actions, as necessary. Members of an institution's staff, student-athletes, and other individuals and groups representing the institution's athletics interests shall comply with the applicable Association rules, including rules requiring cooperation with enforcement efforts, and the member institution shall be responsible for such compliance. (Adopted: 8/1/22) Where we "disagree" is whether being suspended for 1 year truly qualifies as a "punishment" or not. At least people can't make the claim the Iowa wrestler was "banned." Once the NCAA re-instated him via a hardship waiver, the ban essentially became a suspension.
Posted: 06/10/2026 at 11:41 AM ET
(In response to this post by Baltimore_Hokie)

Thread Replies (54)

Full Thread →
B1G telling teams not to scheduled Texas Tech**
MrBayAreaHokie 06/08/26 11:09 PM ET
A player betting against his own team severely undermines the integrity of
RandomAsianGuy 06/09/26 08:27 PM ET
A player betting on his own team also undermines integrity of the system**
marcbvtgm 06/11/26 10:02 AM ET
That is why he is being crucified. **
Big12 guy 06/11/26 11:11 AM ET
The hypocrisy and irony......
2hhoop3 06/09/26 02:17 PM ET
In the last 6 months, including the recent SEC conference meeting, there
JM397 06/09/26 04:49 PM ET
Not worth freaking out about - they should have all done this years ago IMO
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:24 AM ET
Great article......
2hhoop3 06/09/26 05:23 PM ET
Agree 100% (much to my chagrin). **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 09:52 PM ET
I agree. However, I think members within the SEC, Big Ten, & others
JM397 06/09/26 05:37 PM ET
Feels like there is an ulterior motive here
HokieAl 06/09/26 08:40 AM ET
Bro, the guy bet the UNDER in games his own team was playing in.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 10:53 AM ET
It's almost as if the constant advertising of sports gambling during...
MP4VT2004 06/09/26 01:01 PM ET
Sports gambling is just like any other vice. Prohibition of the vice itself
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:43 PM ET
Notice I didn't say anything about outlawing sports gambling.
MP4VT2004 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
No argument from me. Agree with you 100%.**
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
It is looking like conference peer pressure will back TT into a corner
VT ChemE 1986 06/09/26 12:59 PM ET
I agree with you. It's a lose-lose for TT.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:53 PM ET
Yes I know it is bad, but even the Dellinger article last night said
HokieAl 06/09/26 11:33 AM ET
This is free market,
1947Sunbowl 06/09/26 08:57 AM ET
Mandating to blacklist a school in all sports is different
HokieAl 06/09/26 09:17 AM ET
The BIG can do
Big12 guy 06/09/26 09:16 AM ET
I doubt any VT fan on this board would want Sorsby suiting up for them
SMU Pony 06/09/26 11:39 PM ET
I was referring to the BIG refusing
Big12 guy 06/10/26 08:14 AM ET
They cut him from the team, and pay him. End of story. Anything less is BS.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:27 AM ET
I think that is what will happen. The ruling just
Big12 guy 06/10/26 10:50 AM ET
In terms of the issues the Sorby situation has brought to the table, the
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 08:43 AM ET
Big 12 guy, please don't defend this ruling. You're not seeing straight.**
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:07 PM ET
I'd be furious that VT hadn't booted the guy off the team yet.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 10:57 AM ET
Exactly!**
VT ChemE 1986 06/09/26 01:00 PM ET
Paving a way for TTU to can Soresby**
MrFantastic! 06/09/26 09:42 AM ET
Virtue signaling at it's best. **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 10:50 AM ET
Please explain how you consider fury at this ruling "virtue signaling?"
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:00 AM ET
My position has nothing to do with
Big12 guy 06/09/26 11:03 AM ET
Danm, guy. Try to look a little beyond the next CFP. If Sorsby plays
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:13 PM ET
For the record, I do not think Sorsby should play. **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 02:15 PM ET
When Soresby gets ruled out by TTU
MrFantastic! 06/09/26 12:30 PM ET
My response would be, "somebody has to do something here."
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:28 AM ET
The tricky part is that the gambling didn’t happen at TT
HokieAl 06/09/26 01:42 PM ET
Sorsby isn't entitled to play QB for a D1 FBS football team.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:29 PM ET
Of course he will. He has shown not a grain of loyalty to schools, team
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:22 PM ET
Those are good points. is the NIL contract enforceable? It
Big12 guy 06/09/26 01:58 PM ET
I concur almost 100%. From where
Big12 guy 06/09/26 11:45 AM ET
In fairness, when it happened at Iowa, all those players were perma-banned-
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:54 AM ET
If you are referring to the 4 Iowa wrestlers and multiple Iowa and Iowa
VTHokie2000 06/09/26 12:55 PM ET
Completely different circumstances.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
I am not sure the circumstances are that different though. If the Iowa and
VTHokie2000 06/09/26 03:51 PM ET
The situations are night and day. They couldn't be more different.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:32 AM ET
They are both guilty of the same crime which is a violation of the bylaws.
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 11:41 AM ET
No, where we "disagree" is entirely procedural.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 03:09 PM ET
But was that individually really punished though? He essentially got his 1
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
I think I've said all I can say here. We disagree. No need to continue.**
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
Would this of been a thing in 1980s-early noughts
harlote101 06/08/26 11:25 PM ET
Cool. Now do Ped State and Michigan.**
Maroon Baboon 06/08/26 11:15 PM ET
Both of those cases should have included WAAYY more criminal charges.**
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:04 PM ET