Sorsby isn't entitled to play QB for a D1 FBS football team.
It's not some inherent or constitutional right. The judge's opinion re: what constitutes "irreparable harm" is obvious BS, especially in light of the fact that Sorsby is clearly using the Terrell Pryor "delay until the season's over, then drop the suit" strategy. But, as things stand right now, Texas Tech is not explicitly a party to Sorsby's lawsuit, which says, in layman's terms, that the NCAA is impeding his right to be paid $5 million dollars by Texas Tech by declaring him ineligible.
Texas Tech and/or the Big 12 could end this travesty right now by saying Sorsby clearly broke bright line NCAA rules and that he will not play this season. The Big 12 might; there are internal mechanisms for a majority of the conference membership to impose sanctions on a member, including financial penalties and forfeiting games. I won't hold my breath on that. Texas Tech, which is currently engaging in what will go down in history as the most shortsighted act of greed and self-serving possible, absolutely will not unless the heat currently being sent their way gets unbearable.
I think what we're going to see next is the Big 10 and SEC both saying they will not schedule Texas Tech in any sport and all currently scheduled contests will be canceled. Then, the ACC will probably follow suit, because they always have their thumbs up their rear ends waiting to copy whatever the SEC does. Those declarations will be largely performative and will accomplish nothing. The only parties that can actually do something about this before February 2027 are Texas Tech, The Big 12, or the CFP. If neither Texas Tech nor the Big 12 steps in and stops Sorsby from playing, then the CFP will be the last vanguard. They could step in and say Texas Tech will not be eligible to make the CFP field if Sorsby plays a single down, at which time TT would have no choice but to cut him loose. If the CFP also does nothing, and Josh Pate is reporting that his sources at the CFP are saying they plan to do absolutely nothing, then that's it. There are no rules.
Anything would go from then on. If the member institutions of the NCAA can't enforce a prohibition against gambling on your own team, something that goes directly to the basic integrity of the contests being staged, then absolutely nothing can be enforced. Eligibility? Permanent, across the board, doesn't matter if you've been in the NFL and washed out. NIL enforcement? *fart* yeah, right. Academic fraud? Who cares about school. Do players even have to be students? Why bother to even bring that up? Oh, the Heisman favorite QB for a school ranked in the top 10 raped and strangled his girlfriend? Well, he's out on bond and, sorry, he can't suffer any consequences until his criminal case has a final adjudication, which will just so happen to take until after the season, so he can suit up and play ball!
Thread Replies (54)
B1G telling teams not to scheduled Texas Tech**
-- MrBayAreaHokie
Jun 08, 2026 at 11:09 PM ET
MrBayAreaHokie
•
06/08/26 11:09 PM ET
A player betting against his own team severely undermines the integrity of
-- RandomAsianGuy
Jun 09, 2026 at 08:27 PM ET
RandomAsianGuy
•
06/09/26 08:27 PM ET
A player betting on his own team also undermines integrity of the system**
-- marcbvtgm
Jun 11, 2026 at 10:02 AM ET
marcbvtgm
•
06/11/26 10:02 AM ET
That is why he is being crucified. **
-- Big12 guy
Jun 11, 2026 at 11:11 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/11/26 11:11 AM ET
In the last 6 months, including the recent SEC conference meeting, there
-- JM397
Jun 09, 2026 at 04:49 PM ET
JM397
•
06/09/26 04:49 PM ET
Not worth freaking out about - they should have all done this years ago IMO
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 10, 2026 at 10:24 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/10/26 10:24 AM ET
Agree 100% (much to my chagrin). **
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 09:52 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 09:52 PM ET
I agree. However, I think members within the SEC, Big Ten, & others
-- JM397
Jun 09, 2026 at 05:37 PM ET
JM397
•
06/09/26 05:37 PM ET
Feels like there is an ulterior motive here
-- HokieAl
Jun 09, 2026 at 08:40 AM ET
HokieAl
•
06/09/26 08:40 AM ET
Bro, the guy bet the UNDER in games his own team was playing in.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 10:53 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 10:53 AM ET
It's almost as if the constant advertising of sports gambling during...
-- MP4VT2004
Jun 09, 2026 at 01:01 PM ET
MP4VT2004
•
06/09/26 01:01 PM ET
Sports gambling is just like any other vice. Prohibition of the vice itself
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:43 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 02:43 PM ET
Notice I didn't say anything about outlawing sports gambling.
-- MP4VT2004
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:56 PM ET
MP4VT2004
•
06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
No argument from me. Agree with you 100%.**
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:56 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
It is looking like conference peer pressure will back TT into a corner
-- VT ChemE 1986
Jun 09, 2026 at 12:59 PM ET
VT ChemE 1986
•
06/09/26 12:59 PM ET
I agree with you. It's a lose-lose for TT.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:53 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 02:53 PM ET
Yes I know it is bad, but even the Dellinger article last night said
-- HokieAl
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:33 AM ET
HokieAl
•
06/09/26 11:33 AM ET
Mandating to blacklist a school in all sports is different
-- HokieAl
Jun 09, 2026 at 09:17 AM ET
HokieAl
•
06/09/26 09:17 AM ET
I doubt any VT fan on this board would want Sorsby suiting up for them
-- SMU Pony
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:39 PM ET
SMU Pony
•
06/09/26 11:39 PM ET
I was referring to the BIG refusing
-- Big12 guy
Jun 10, 2026 at 08:14 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/10/26 08:14 AM ET
They cut him from the team, and pay him. End of story. Anything less is BS.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 10, 2026 at 10:27 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/10/26 10:27 AM ET
I think that is what will happen. The ruling just
-- Big12 guy
Jun 10, 2026 at 10:50 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/10/26 10:50 AM ET
In terms of the issues the Sorby situation has brought to the table, the
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 10, 2026 at 08:43 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/10/26 08:43 AM ET
Big 12 guy, please don't defend this ruling. You're not seeing straight.**
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:07 PM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/09/26 02:07 PM ET
I'd be furious that VT hadn't booted the guy off the team yet.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 10:57 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 10:57 AM ET
Paving a way for TTU to can Soresby**
-- MrFantastic!
Jun 09, 2026 at 09:42 AM ET
MrFantastic!
•
06/09/26 09:42 AM ET
Virtue signaling at it's best. **
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 10:50 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 10:50 AM ET
Please explain how you consider fury at this ruling "virtue signaling?"
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:00 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 11:00 AM ET
My position has nothing to do with
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:03 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 11:03 AM ET
Danm, guy. Try to look a little beyond the next CFP. If Sorsby plays
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:13 PM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/09/26 02:13 PM ET
For the record, I do not think Sorsby should play. **
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:15 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 02:15 PM ET
When Soresby gets ruled out by TTU
-- MrFantastic!
Jun 09, 2026 at 12:30 PM ET
MrFantastic!
•
06/09/26 12:30 PM ET
My response would be, "somebody has to do something here."
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:28 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 11:28 AM ET
The tricky part is that the gambling didn’t happen at TT
-- HokieAl
Jun 09, 2026 at 01:42 PM ET
HokieAl
•
06/09/26 01:42 PM ET
Sorsby isn't entitled to play QB for a D1 FBS football team.
◄
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:29 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 02:29 PM ET
Of course he will. He has shown not a grain of loyalty to schools, team
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:22 PM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/09/26 02:22 PM ET
Those are good points. is the NIL contract enforceable? It
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 01:58 PM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 01:58 PM ET
I concur almost 100%. From where
-- Big12 guy
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:45 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
06/09/26 11:45 AM ET
In fairness, when it happened at Iowa, all those players were perma-banned-
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 11:54 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 11:54 AM ET
If you are referring to the 4 Iowa wrestlers and multiple Iowa and Iowa
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 09, 2026 at 12:55 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/09/26 12:55 PM ET
Completely different circumstances.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:56 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
I am not sure the circumstances are that different though. If the Iowa and
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 09, 2026 at 03:51 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/09/26 03:51 PM ET
The situations are night and day. They couldn't be more different.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 10, 2026 at 10:32 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/10/26 10:32 AM ET
They are both guilty of the same crime which is a violation of the bylaws.
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 10, 2026 at 11:41 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/10/26 11:41 AM ET
No, where we "disagree" is entirely procedural.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 10, 2026 at 03:09 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/10/26 03:09 PM ET
But was that individually really punished though? He essentially got his 1
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 10, 2026 at 05:32 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
I think I've said all I can say here. We disagree. No need to continue.**
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Jun 10, 2026 at 05:32 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
Would this of been a thing in 1980s-early noughts
-- harlote101
Jun 08, 2026 at 11:25 PM ET
harlote101
•
06/08/26 11:25 PM ET
Cool. Now do Ped State and Michigan.**
-- Maroon Baboon
Jun 08, 2026 at 11:15 PM ET
Maroon Baboon
•
06/08/26 11:15 PM ET
Both of those cases should have included WAAYY more criminal charges.**
-- 33laszlo99
Jun 09, 2026 at 02:04 PM ET
33laszlo99
•
06/09/26 02:04 PM ET