All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

B
Joined: 10/03/2022
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 4,007
Subscriber

Sorsby isn't entitled to play QB for a D1 FBS football team.

It's not some inherent or constitutional right. The judge's opinion re: what constitutes "irreparable harm" is obvious BS, especially in light of the fact that Sorsby is clearly using the Terrell Pryor "delay until the season's over, then drop the suit" strategy. But, as things stand right now, Texas Tech is not explicitly a party to Sorsby's lawsuit, which says, in layman's terms, that the NCAA is impeding his right to be paid $5 million dollars by Texas Tech by declaring him ineligible. Texas Tech and/or the Big 12 could end this travesty right now by saying Sorsby clearly broke bright line NCAA rules and that he will not play this season. The Big 12 might; there are internal mechanisms for a majority of the conference membership to impose sanctions on a member, including financial penalties and forfeiting games. I won't hold my breath on that. Texas Tech, which is currently engaging in what will go down in history as the most shortsighted act of greed and self-serving possible, absolutely will not unless the heat currently being sent their way gets unbearable. I think what we're going to see next is the Big 10 and SEC both saying they will not schedule Texas Tech in any sport and all currently scheduled contests will be canceled. Then, the ACC will probably follow suit, because they always have their thumbs up their rear ends waiting to copy whatever the SEC does. Those declarations will be largely performative and will accomplish nothing. The only parties that can actually do something about this before February 2027 are Texas Tech, The Big 12, or the CFP. If neither Texas Tech nor the Big 12 steps in and stops Sorsby from playing, then the CFP will be the last vanguard. They could step in and say Texas Tech will not be eligible to make the CFP field if Sorsby plays a single down, at which time TT would have no choice but to cut him loose. If the CFP also does nothing, and Josh Pate is reporting that his sources at the CFP are saying they plan to do absolutely nothing, then that's it. There are no rules. Anything would go from then on. If the member institutions of the NCAA can't enforce a prohibition against gambling on your own team, something that goes directly to the basic integrity of the contests being staged, then absolutely nothing can be enforced. Eligibility? Permanent, across the board, doesn't matter if you've been in the NFL and washed out. NIL enforcement? *fart* yeah, right. Academic fraud? Who cares about school. Do players even have to be students? Why bother to even bring that up? Oh, the Heisman favorite QB for a school ranked in the top 10 raped and strangled his girlfriend? Well, he's out on bond and, sorry, he can't suffer any consequences until his criminal case has a final adjudication, which will just so happen to take until after the season, so he can suit up and play ball!
Posted: 06/09/2026 at 02:29 PM ET
(In response to this post by HokieAl)

Thread Replies (54)

Full Thread →
B1G telling teams not to scheduled Texas Tech**
MrBayAreaHokie 06/08/26 11:09 PM ET
A player betting against his own team severely undermines the integrity of
RandomAsianGuy 06/09/26 08:27 PM ET
A player betting on his own team also undermines integrity of the system**
marcbvtgm 06/11/26 10:02 AM ET
That is why he is being crucified. **
Big12 guy 06/11/26 11:11 AM ET
The hypocrisy and irony......
2hhoop3 06/09/26 02:17 PM ET
In the last 6 months, including the recent SEC conference meeting, there
JM397 06/09/26 04:49 PM ET
Not worth freaking out about - they should have all done this years ago IMO
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:24 AM ET
Great article......
2hhoop3 06/09/26 05:23 PM ET
Agree 100% (much to my chagrin). **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 09:52 PM ET
I agree. However, I think members within the SEC, Big Ten, & others
JM397 06/09/26 05:37 PM ET
Feels like there is an ulterior motive here
HokieAl 06/09/26 08:40 AM ET
Bro, the guy bet the UNDER in games his own team was playing in.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 10:53 AM ET
It's almost as if the constant advertising of sports gambling during...
MP4VT2004 06/09/26 01:01 PM ET
Sports gambling is just like any other vice. Prohibition of the vice itself
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:43 PM ET
Notice I didn't say anything about outlawing sports gambling.
MP4VT2004 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
No argument from me. Agree with you 100%.**
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
It is looking like conference peer pressure will back TT into a corner
VT ChemE 1986 06/09/26 12:59 PM ET
I agree with you. It's a lose-lose for TT.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:53 PM ET
Yes I know it is bad, but even the Dellinger article last night said
HokieAl 06/09/26 11:33 AM ET
This is free market,
1947Sunbowl 06/09/26 08:57 AM ET
Mandating to blacklist a school in all sports is different
HokieAl 06/09/26 09:17 AM ET
The BIG can do
Big12 guy 06/09/26 09:16 AM ET
I doubt any VT fan on this board would want Sorsby suiting up for them
SMU Pony 06/09/26 11:39 PM ET
I was referring to the BIG refusing
Big12 guy 06/10/26 08:14 AM ET
They cut him from the team, and pay him. End of story. Anything less is BS.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:27 AM ET
I think that is what will happen. The ruling just
Big12 guy 06/10/26 10:50 AM ET
In terms of the issues the Sorby situation has brought to the table, the
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 08:43 AM ET
Big 12 guy, please don't defend this ruling. You're not seeing straight.**
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:07 PM ET
I'd be furious that VT hadn't booted the guy off the team yet.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 10:57 AM ET
Exactly!**
VT ChemE 1986 06/09/26 01:00 PM ET
Paving a way for TTU to can Soresby**
MrFantastic! 06/09/26 09:42 AM ET
Virtue signaling at it's best. **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 10:50 AM ET
Please explain how you consider fury at this ruling "virtue signaling?"
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:00 AM ET
My position has nothing to do with
Big12 guy 06/09/26 11:03 AM ET
Danm, guy. Try to look a little beyond the next CFP. If Sorsby plays
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:13 PM ET
For the record, I do not think Sorsby should play. **
Big12 guy 06/09/26 02:15 PM ET
When Soresby gets ruled out by TTU
MrFantastic! 06/09/26 12:30 PM ET
My response would be, "somebody has to do something here."
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:28 AM ET
The tricky part is that the gambling didn’t happen at TT
HokieAl 06/09/26 01:42 PM ET
Sorsby isn't entitled to play QB for a D1 FBS football team.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:29 PM ET
Of course he will. He has shown not a grain of loyalty to schools, team
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:22 PM ET
Those are good points. is the NIL contract enforceable? It
Big12 guy 06/09/26 01:58 PM ET
I concur almost 100%. From where
Big12 guy 06/09/26 11:45 AM ET
In fairness, when it happened at Iowa, all those players were perma-banned-
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 11:54 AM ET
If you are referring to the 4 Iowa wrestlers and multiple Iowa and Iowa
VTHokie2000 06/09/26 12:55 PM ET
Completely different circumstances.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/09/26 02:56 PM ET
I am not sure the circumstances are that different though. If the Iowa and
VTHokie2000 06/09/26 03:51 PM ET
The situations are night and day. They couldn't be more different.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 10:32 AM ET
They are both guilty of the same crime which is a violation of the bylaws.
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 11:41 AM ET
No, where we "disagree" is entirely procedural.
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 03:09 PM ET
But was that individually really punished though? He essentially got his 1
VTHokie2000 06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
I think I've said all I can say here. We disagree. No need to continue.**
Baltimore_Hokie 06/10/26 05:32 PM ET
Would this of been a thing in 1980s-early noughts
harlote101 06/08/26 11:25 PM ET
Cool. Now do Ped State and Michigan.**
Maroon Baboon 06/08/26 11:15 PM ET
Both of those cases should have included WAAYY more criminal charges.**
33laszlo99 06/09/26 02:04 PM ET