Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
Femoyer Hokie
Joined: 05/20/2003
Posts: 12,359
Likes: 9,501
Femoyer Hokie
Subscriber

Probably not in the ACC.

Posted: 01/31/2025 at 12:10 PM ET
(In response to this post by VTHokie2000)

Thread Replies (113)

Full Thread →
So was this extension a good thing for VT
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 09:47 AM ET
VT now controls its own fate in the short term
HokieAl • 01/31/25 04:37 PM ET
Scheduling could be a challenge forward
HouClone • 01/31/25 07:48 PM ET
Simple message and 100% on target**
mancunian • 01/31/25 04:46 PM ET
Apparently we voted for it, so yes?
daveinop • 01/31/25 03:50 PM ET
Unequal revenue is how all conferences should be run.
HouClone • 01/31/25 03:35 PM ET
History tells us that unequal revenue sharing is the beginning of the end-
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 05:10 PM ET
Disagree. Vandy will not be making Bama/Georgia money forever.**
Hardcore_Hokie • 01/31/25 05:33 PM ET
Not sure where I mentioned Vanderbilt. My point was that-
Baltimore_Hokie • 02/03/25 10:38 AM ET
2 positives. IMO.
Maroon Baboon • 01/31/25 01:53 PM ET
I don't think VT has a landing spot in the P2 at this point.
RandomAsianGuy • 01/31/25 12:26 PM ET
While the University Brand and size is excellent Athletic Dept ????
1947Sunbowl • 01/31/25 04:32 PM ET
My personal stupid opinion is that there will be a "buy your way in" option
Hokie Fiji • 01/31/25 03:43 PM ET
This is what all the Big East football programs were thinking, I'm sure.
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 03:25 PM ET
True
obguthr • 01/31/25 03:22 PM ET
You are correct we don’t bring anything to the p2.
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 12:32 PM ET
In a word yes. For the lesser programs like VT it preserves the conference
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 11:54 AM ET
There are zero positives for VT in the extension. Everything is worse.
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 11:30 AM ET
This is so dumb
SpeakToDamien • 01/31/25 11:39 PM ET
"Viewership" almost certainly will be based on some sort of normalized
Vippie1 • 01/31/25 04:50 PM ET
Giving two of those three a ND every year means their viewer numbers will..
EDGEMAN • 01/31/25 05:08 PM ET
No matter how much lipstick you try to put on this pig-
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 05:03 PM ET
So you think VT is a below average ACC brand and will be a net subsidizing
Vippie1 • 01/31/25 05:42 PM ET
Go real quick and count how many times VT has played on network TV, ESPN-
Baltimore_Hokie • 02/03/25 10:35 AM ET
Disaster, no positives?
Vippie1 • 01/31/25 03:47 PM ET
Like what, exactly? Let's hear it.**
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 04:01 PM ET
Eventually those teams wanted by ESPN etc will go.
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 02:45 PM ET
Clearly, there's no real other options for VT "right now," today, 1/31/2025
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 03:19 PM ET
If/When the football brands leave the ACC, the ACC may end up using this
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 04:06 PM ET
That would track with history.
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 04:27 PM ET
Maybe the football schools should dust off the Metro Conference name.
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 04:31 PM ET
Ah, the Metro. The original all-sports Super Conference.
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 04:41 PM ET
Some potentials reasons why an ACC school may not want to join the Big XII
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 07:30 PM ET
I don't think any of that is necessarily wrong. I do think-
Baltimore_Hokie • 02/03/25 10:44 AM ET
I agree with the Big XII schools aren't going to leave to join the ACC.
VTHokie2000 • 02/06/25 09:53 AM ET
The 2036 date is bad, really bad unless your goal
Big12 guy • 02/03/25 02:33 PM ET
What you miss is the B12 is now just like the acc will be once
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:33 PM ET
With respect, I certainly do, and that is not because I live
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 04:06 PM ET
I hate to break this to you, but there is no "our ACC brothers."
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 03:57 PM ET
Some day you will have to acknowledge VT was never going to be one of
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 07:07 PM ET
Yes, Maryland, Rutgers, Northwestern, Vanderbilt-
Baltimore_Hokie • 02/03/25 10:32 AM ET
VT plays more games on ACCN because VT stinks.
hokieZ71 • 01/31/25 01:07 PM ET
That’s the price you pay for sucking and underperforming for 15+ years.
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 12:00 PM ET
deleted
Maroon Baboon • 01/31/25 01:42 PM ET
VT's management issues probably goes back to the JW days because VT didn't
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:39 PM ET
Compared to Whit, JW was a juggernaut in outreach and
saret • 01/31/25 10:08 PM ET
How would anyone know how much carpe there was to diem?**
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 02:53 PM ET
How do you keep defending Whit doing his job? Is there anything you ....
Atlee Hokie • 02/01/25 07:08 AM ET
That is why leadership gets paid the big bucks. An organization can either
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:03 PM ET
Yeah, demand increased under JW. Whit's killing it. I was not a
saret • 01/31/25 10:12 PM ET
Was the fact the donors did not rocket to new levels, the admin
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:16 PM ET
After Whit took over, it was his fault.
Atlee Hokie • 02/01/25 04:14 AM ET
Now here is something real put out there
VTCALS72 • 02/01/25 08:46 AM ET
It was the admin not knowing how to fundraise.**
NokieHokie • 01/31/25 03:37 PM ET
Except I was talking about the early 2000s when JW was in charge. There
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:28 PM ET
I totally agree. It does go back that far. However that doesn’t let Whit
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 02:10 PM ET
Ahhh so your take is Whit screwed up by not seeing the future $$$$ needs
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 02:59 PM ET
It probably doesn't let them off the hook. However, I will say it may be
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 02:37 PM ET
That is largely ......
2hhoop3 • 01/31/25 02:49 PM ET
The runway wasn't long enough for VT to pivot quickly to the changes that
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 02:54 PM ET
You're entitled to .......
2hhoop3 • 01/31/25 03:02 PM ET
If VT had been more proactive in the early 2000s, then it would have been
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:16 PM ET
IF.....
2hhoop3 • 01/31/25 03:24 PM ET
Both Babcock & Weaver are responsible. And the Hokie Club. And Frank Beamer**
NokieHokie • 01/31/25 03:39 PM ET
Babcock can only play the hand that he was dealt. I don't disagree that
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:34 PM ET
Do you think it’s Whit’s job to set out a vision to engage fans and alumni
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 09:05 PM ET
I do think it is the role of the AD, since the person is head of the
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 10:38 PM ET
IMO, Whit has done and is doing more damage to VT athletics than ...
Atlee Hokie • 01/31/25 10:00 PM ET
This!
RJHokie • 01/31/25 09:48 PM ET
That is a.....
2hhoop3 • 01/31/25 03:41 PM ET
I think the extension is probably neutral for VT because it has some
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 10:08 AM ET
It buys time for now, which is a good thing. Out here in the
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 10:58 AM ET
Does it really buy any time though? As I noted in my response below, teams
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 11:06 AM ET
Wake and BC, along with VT and probably 50 more are just not relevant to
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:09 PM ET
Is there even a level between P2 and G5?**
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:17 PM ET
That is what the B12 AND ACC are fighting to have, something better than G5**
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:20 PM ET
Are you sure they haven't already lost the war before the first shot was
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:29 PM ET
This is the piece many miss on this topic. There isn’t a direct correlation
Femoyer Hokie • 01/31/25 11:58 AM ET
Spot on**
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:21 PM ET
I disagree and point to Indiana and SMU as examples
Hardcore_Hokie • 01/31/25 03:04 PM ET
There is a difference between relevance and brand.
Femoyer Hokie • 01/31/25 03:52 PM ET
VT already has an established brand. If VT wins, the brand just gets on TV
hokieZ71 • 01/31/25 01:41 PM ET
Yup. The VT brand in football is strong.
Hardcore_Hokie • 01/31/25 05:21 PM ET
I don't think it is any easier because IMHO the VT brand is not as big
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:25 PM ET
You are right that is all a school can control at this time. If 2031 is
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:03 PM ET
Probably not in the ACC.** ◄
Femoyer Hokie • 01/31/25 12:10 PM ET
The expanded playoff changes that. if it's a game for a spot
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 12:01 PM ET
Yes. It will garner attention. Often mostly due to the opponent. And just
Femoyer Hokie • 01/31/25 12:09 PM ET
How long did it take for Boise State to build its brand though?**
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:04 PM ET
You have to start somewhere. The NFL determines their schedule
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 12:19 PM ET
Given that schedules are agreed upon years in advance, leaving 1-2 open
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:25 PM ET
What if there was a scheduling contract between conferences where only
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 12:38 PM ET
Unless the opponent would be locked in for 2 years, then it becomes an
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:43 PM ET
ACC has home games one year, the B12 has the home games the next. It
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 01:26 PM ET
I doubt the ACC is even playing for the next contract because some of the
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 01:46 PM ET
Establish that the entire conference get the home games
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 12:48 PM ET
I doubt majority of the ADs will buy into that idea though because the
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:55 PM ET
It's about the TV. Attendance isn't a problem for the B12, no matter who
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 12:58 PM ET
I did find this website which has pictures from 2021. If you scroll down
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 01:52 PM ET
KU and Houston do not sell out. With the new stadium,
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 04:14 PM ET
My point though is will those stadiums be consistently full if the ACC
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 04:18 PM ET
Yes, they would be full, and I don't know about the younger
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 05:02 PM ET
It has been years and even decades since BC, GT, Pitt, and Syracuse have
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 07:41 PM ET
I understand that ratings is driving things. However, it doesn't mean ADs
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 01:39 PM ET
We don't know the details of the "list of 3". there has just been one
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 11:17 AM ET
I would be very surprised if the list is dynamic for a couple reasons.
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 11:28 AM ET
I will be disappointed if it's not dynamic, but if that is what
Big12 guy • 01/31/25 11:36 AM ET
Given that the group, who benefits the most from this change, is small, the
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 12:18 PM ET
You're one of the only folks on here that I can tell really gets "it."**
Baltimore_Hokie • 01/31/25 03:31 PM ET
Thanks. It may help that I was one of the few people on here who thought
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 03:37 PM ET
Playing ND less often hurts VT's football image.
EDGEMAN • 01/31/25 10:53 AM ET
VT’s administration has done plenty to diminish VT. We are now getting
Poultrygeist • 01/31/25 12:07 PM ET
So what part did the VT admin play in diminishing us
VTCALS72 • 01/31/25 03:18 PM ET
Plus, it does not give the other schools any real incentive to improve
VTHokie2000 • 01/31/25 10:54 AM ET