Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
X
Joined: 08/08/2023
Posts: 86
Likes: 21
xx97

I've seen nothing to suggest the b12 had any interest in the Pac 4.

The proposal to merge was made and was shot down by the b12. The b12 always said its focus was the 4C.....and they achieved that. The day after adding them Big 12 officials were quoted as saying, "we're done". ** Edited by xx97 at 9/1/2023, 6:16:02 PM
Posted: 09/01/2023 at 06:15 PM ET
(In response to this post by Stech)

Thread Replies (35)

Full Thread →
B12 rejects are now official ACC members!
xx97 • 09/01/23 03:19 PM ET
Who did you beat out for Colorado ect? Lol**
HokiePail • 09/01/23 07:00 PM ET
Why the insecurity?
Old Line Hokie • 09/01/23 06:48 PM ET
Logic won't work with the Big12 fanatics. Desperate to be #3.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 06:50 PM ET
I'm nit the one pretending the b12 had any interest in Calford.
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:07 PM ET
Oh, so now it's that the Big12 had no interest? Gotcha.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 07:10 PM ET
Piss off, kid.**
mancunian • 09/01/23 06:03 PM ET
Yep, kind of like you all with BYU, Houston and UCF…
BROman Hokie • 09/01/23 04:49 PM ET
I agree that the b12 and acc have more in common than not
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:07 PM ET
Still, the ACC didn’t lose its top brands**
BROman Hokie • 09/01/23 10:18 PM ET
Arizona is the only program that moves the needle. But yes, good for you.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 08:59 PM ET
Repeatedly saying it does not make it so. SMU is the only "reject"
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 04:46 PM ET
Please detail where Cal and Stanford "had no interest"...
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:08 PM ET
Cal and Stanford never applied to B12 to be rejected - and not sure b12
Hokie12thman • 09/01/23 03:38 PM ET
Says who?
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:03 PM ET
Not accurate.......
2hhoop3 • 09/01/23 10:36 PM ET
Correct - SMU was rejected by Big 12 - like I said -already have 4 in TX
Hokie12thman • 09/01/23 05:37 PM ET
Of course, because SMU is obvious overlap with TCU.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 04:47 PM ET
So was Utah with BYU. Dogs are dogs.**
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:11 PM ET
Yes but you're the one who took them. Also, don't forget Baylor.
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 06:48 PM ET
The main reason SMU madezero sense is because
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:10 PM ET
That's yet to be seen, but we got them for FREE and got into Texas.**
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 07:11 PM ET
SMU begged the b12 for free membership long ago. They're crap.**
xx97 • 09/01/23 07:13 PM ET
Again, the Big12 already had stupid overlap, that's why they weren't added.
neworleanshoo • 09/01/23 08:57 PM ET
Oh look, it’s message board version of the UnaBomber**
ombandit • 09/01/23 03:36 PM ET
There was rejection, but not by the B12.**
Stech • 09/01/23 03:33 PM ET
B12 already rejected a full on PAC merger. They didn't want the 4 rejects.
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:04 PM ET
Right on SMU, wrong on Stanford and Cal, but stop the rivalry stuff, this
Stech • 09/01/23 04:33 PM ET
Nothing personal. Just having fun with realignment.
xx97 • 09/01/23 05:00 PM ET
Full yes, but they knew Stanford and Cal would not come, Oregon State and
Stech • 09/01/23 05:19 PM ET
I've seen nothing to suggest the b12 had any interest in the Pac 4. ◄
xx97 • 09/01/23 06:15 PM ET
Sure they were done, because Stanford and Cal had no interest.**
Stech • 09/01/23 08:40 PM ET
Hey, Richard! You have yet to share UCFs
HOKIEGOBBLE • 09/01/23 03:27 PM ET
Not a UCF fan. But I bet it smokes SMU, Cal, and Stanford's, though
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:05 PM ET
You've got some real Baghdad Bob energy going. I like it. **
KaHOOnah • 09/01/23 03:27 PM ET
Huh?
xx97 • 09/01/23 04:01 PM ET