All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Maroon Baboon
Joined: 10/14/2003
Posts: 30,199
Likes: 22,204

I agree. The only reason VT would have been taken by the SEC is because

UNC was too devout to the ACC. But in the end, maybe for different reasons, both were devout to the ACC.
Posted: 07/28/2022 at 01:11 PM ET
(In response to this post by ChrisLords)

Thread Replies (17)

Full Thread →
West Virginia claims they had a contract from SEC when Texas A&M was 2 join
LocalExperts 07/27/22 09:23 PM ET
Not sure, but VT had that spot until they VERY publicly turned it down. **
BBBDatVT 07/28/22 05:25 PM ET
When you say “West Virginia claims”, who exactly was making this claim?**
marcbvtgm 07/28/22 12:55 PM ET
West Virginia in SEC?
WarHog38 07/27/22 10:39 PM ET
There was a vocal group of ACC apologists on this board.
BBBDatVT 07/28/22 05:00 PM ET
I totally agree with you
WarHog38 07/28/22 05:26 PM ET
It didn't have anything to do with FSU. But UVa.
Maroon Baboon 07/27/22 11:51 PM ET
Will not argue with that being the overriding sentiment
WarHog38 07/28/22 12:43 AM ET
It's all good. There was and still is a kinship with football first schools
Maroon Baboon 07/28/22 01:06 AM ET
If the ACC had taken UConn instead of Louisville, FSU and Clemson were
ChrisLords 07/28/22 12:41 PM ET
Yes. Totally forgot about the UL angle to this. I'm not sure how close
Maroon Baboon 07/28/22 01:24 PM ET
I remember that like it was yesterday.
hokieZ71 07/27/22 10:51 PM ET
VT to SEC at that point was a nonstarter due to in-state UVa connections
Maroon Baboon 07/27/22 10:00 PM ET
I seem to remember the ACC was ready to fall apart at that time and that
ChrisLords 07/28/22 12:37 PM ET
I agree. The only reason VT would have been taken by the SEC is because
Maroon Baboon 07/28/22 01:11 PM ET
Poppy Cock ;-)**
133193Hokie 07/28/22 10:28 AM ET
How I remember this
Millpoint 07/28/22 09:34 AM ET
The VT to SEC question would be another good one for Greg Roberts**
LaneRat 07/28/22 12:45 PM ET