But would Stanford and Cal really want to keep the ACC around? Or...
would they rather land in the B1G long term, that isn't likely to happen for the next 5-10 years, so why not join a league that gives good (not great) economics, has member institutions that care more about things you care about than other options like the Big12, and then when the next round comes they'll be positioned to exit and land in one of the coast-to-coast P2s along with others in the ACC that are ultimately headed that route?? Again, just feels like a longer term under current could be playing out here for the have's vs. the have nots.
Thread Replies (4)
ACC strategy - if Stanford and Cal join, is this move potentially
-- mwke
Aug 08, 2023 at 09:49 AM ET
mwke
•
08/08/23 09:49 AM ET
A PAC ("own the coasts") merger was a scenario 20 months ago before it was
-- VT757to276
Aug 08, 2023 at 10:26 AM ET
VT757to276
•
08/08/23 10:26 AM ET
This could influence voting
-- The_VT_Rock
Aug 08, 2023 at 09:52 AM ET
The_VT_Rock
•
08/08/23 09:52 AM ET
This is an interesting point. This might be as much about stacking the
-- TDVick
Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46 PM ET
TDVick
•
08/08/23 06:46 PM ET
But would Stanford and Cal really want to keep the ACC around? Or...
◄
-- mwke
Aug 08, 2023 at 10:04 AM ET
mwke
•
08/08/23 10:04 AM ET