All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

M
Joined: 10/16/1999
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 393
Founder Lifetime

But would Stanford and Cal really want to keep the ACC around? Or...

would they rather land in the B1G long term, that isn't likely to happen for the next 5-10 years, so why not join a league that gives good (not great) economics, has member institutions that care more about things you care about than other options like the Big12, and then when the next round comes they'll be positioned to exit and land in one of the coast-to-coast P2s along with others in the ACC that are ultimately headed that route?? Again, just feels like a longer term under current could be playing out here for the have's vs. the have nots.
Posted: 08/08/2023 at 10:04 AM ET
(In response to this post by The_VT_Rock)

Thread Replies (4)

Full Thread →
ACC strategy - if Stanford and Cal join, is this move potentially
mwke 08/08/23 09:49 AM ET
A PAC ("own the coasts") merger was a scenario 20 months ago before it was
VT757to276 08/08/23 10:26 AM ET
This could influence voting
The_VT_Rock 08/08/23 09:52 AM ET
This is an interesting point. This might be as much about stacking the
TDVick 08/08/23 06:46 PM ET
But would Stanford and Cal really want to keep the ACC around? Or...
mwke 08/08/23 10:04 AM ET