All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

GBOHokie
Joined: 10/09/1999
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 9,749
Founder Lifetime

Good stuff. But the problem is, these are visible numbers.

Doesn’t show NIL (I know pretty much impossible). It’s hard to even guess revenue sharing from these. I assume that would/will become embedded in expenses. We upped our NIL numbers this year is my understanding. But no idea how they compare. I would venture to guess, if we had the top NIL number of this group we have an adequate bball investment to be a top team in this group. If we do have the top NIL investment or even near the top not sure about your money ball comment. If near middle or bottom then I agree. All to say. Hard to judge without the full picture. But the graph is very telling.
Posted: 02/16/2026 at 10:46 AM ET
(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)

Thread Replies (13)

Full Thread →
There seemed to be some cohesivness issues going on
B Hokie 02/15/26 02:31 PM ET
Despite all the usual talk about money
Gobbler Guru 02/16/26 12:51 PM ET
Funny, but I was thinking similarly today. Who has done more with
B Hokie 02/16/26 05:54 PM ET
Schutt
jpking17 02/16/26 09:10 AM ET
inadequate coaching**
lazarus1 02/15/26 08:51 PM ET
No, inadequate coaching would be taking Tyler Johnsons scholarship**
GCHokie34 02/15/26 11:18 PM ET
serious question, not rhetorical
lazarus1 02/15/26 11:48 PM ET
Nobody considers WBB to be underfunded. It's well-funded, actually.
Chris ColemanAdmin 02/16/26 10:06 AM ET
Good stuff. But the problem is, these are visible numbers.
GBOHokie 02/16/26 10:46 AM ET
Revenue sharing is going to be about $3.5 million everywhere...
GCHokie34 02/16/26 07:18 PM ET
Last year I think we were bottom three in NIL.
Chris ColemanAdmin 02/16/26 10:59 AM ET
Because it is relative to your peers
GCHokie34 02/16/26 12:00 AM ET
That's a good way to phrase it.
David CunninghamAdmin 02/16/26 11:11 AM ET
Yes**
marcbvtgm 02/15/26 02:51 PM ET