S
Joined:
07/30/2012
Posts:
13,519
Likes:
11,466
Probably so they can adjust it if teams game it, it’s way better than RPI
The RPI was incredibly easy to game and the only thing that mattered was wins and losses. It was quite easy to mask a bad team behind a schedule that resulted in a high RPI.
The Net ranking components are very easy to understand. Efficiency is just OPPP - DPPP adjusted for home/away and strength of opponent (I would bet they index for average efficiency and use that as a multiplier)
The team value index probably just awards point values to wins and losses based on the same adjustment they use for efficiency.
It’s a very easy system to understand and if teams start to game it by scheduling cupcakes to blow them out they can move the slider over to team value index to lessen the impact
** Edited by soflahokie at 1/20/2026, 2:08:49 PM
Thread Replies (24)
Would love to know from the NET defenders how to explain Indiana 38
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2026 at 07:48 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/26 07:48 PM ET
Ironically #30 in RPI. **
-- Nelsonia Hokie
Jan 21, 2026 at 05:56 PM ET
Nelsonia Hokie
•
01/21/26 05:56 PM ET
It isn't about wins and losses. It's about efficiency.
-- VT ChemE 1986
Jan 20, 2026 at 01:53 PM ET
VT ChemE 1986
•
01/20/26 01:53 PM ET
The same reason they're #37 in KenPom and VT is #57.
-- Lumbee09
Jan 20, 2026 at 12:53 PM ET
Lumbee09
•
01/20/26 12:53 PM ET
The actual ranking doesn't matter very much.
-- Chris Coleman
Jan 20, 2026 at 09:09 AM ET
Chris Coleman
•
01/20/26 09:09 AM ET
Ok but doesn’t that punish VT opponents & reward IU
-- hokiepro
Jan 21, 2026 at 08:05 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/21/26 08:05 PM ET
They are way more efficient than us, if they keep losing it’ll correct
-- soflahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 06:27 AM ET
soflahokie
•
01/20/26 06:27 AM ET
So “efficiently” winning vs bad teams or losing vs good teams is better
-- hokiepro
Jan 20, 2026 at 02:58 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/20/26 02:58 PM ET
Yes, you continuing to sweat the NET does sound ridiculous.
-- Pylons
Jan 21, 2026 at 10:16 AM ET
Pylons
•
01/21/26 10:16 AM ET
It would be really cool if we knew how the NET was calculated.**
-- hoosnowahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 08:15 AM ET
hoosnowahokie
•
01/20/26 08:15 AM ET
We do, the NET is a weighting of Team Value Index + Adjusted Net Efficiency
-- soflahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 09:18 AM ET
soflahokie
•
01/20/26 09:18 AM ET
Which is an educated guess. I still think it's odd they haven't
-- hoosnowahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 01:11 PM ET
hoosnowahokie
•
01/20/26 01:11 PM ET
Probably so they can adjust it if teams game it, it’s way better than RPI
◄
-- soflahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 02:08 PM ET
soflahokie
•
01/20/26 02:08 PM ET
Teams game the NET by not resting starters and continuing to blow out very
-- hokiepro
Jan 20, 2026 at 03:00 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/20/26 03:00 PM ET
IU has had some crazy efficient games, VT has only had one (St. Joes)
-- soflahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 03:26 PM ET
soflahokie
•
01/20/26 03:26 PM ET
Indiana loses big to good teams
-- hokiepro
Jan 20, 2026 at 06:48 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/20/26 06:48 PM ET
Limited q4 gms played vs us. **
-- GoldCoast
Jan 19, 2026 at 08:08 PM ET
GoldCoast
•
01/19/26 08:08 PM ET
Here's more info in a quick look (pic)**
-- hoosnowahokie
Jan 20, 2026 at 08:16 AM ET
hoosnowahokie
•
01/20/26 08:16 AM ET
False we are 6-0 they are 7-0; their non conference SoS is 200+ NET AND RPI
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2026 at 08:37 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/26 08:37 PM ET
Indiana is 37 in kenpom and 46 in Massey...
-- Gobbler-100
Jan 19, 2026 at 09:26 PM ET
Gobbler-100
•
01/19/26 09:26 PM ET
Unfortunately true about SMU & Stanford **
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2026 at 09:35 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/26 09:35 PM ET
They have ONE Q1&2 wins we have SIX!!**
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2026 at 08:57 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/26 08:57 PM ET