All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

G
Joined: 09/23/2002
Posts: 25,683
Likes: 8,625

Yes, 100% of the time, for 2 reasons.

1) The ACC tourney championship alone would've been worth 7 yrs of otherwise terrible basketball, much less something considerably better than terrible most years 2) Averaging about 1 game below .500 in ACC play is, as GCH keeps pointing out, quite decent by our standards. But also if it's the average over 7 yrs, odds are you'll have at least 1 season during that stretch that's clearly tournament worthy, maybe 2. Package all that together with a few NIT appearances and, well, that's what passes as a great seven-year run for VT MBB (like it or not). Could we "aim higher?" Absolutely, but not with the current state of our athletic department, not realistically. As frustrated as I've been with this particular team's approach this season and the Nail The Windows Shut Before I Jump Out Of One reaction that has inevitably provoked...GCH is fundamentally right about the Mike Young era. 2 NCAA tourneys, presumably 3 NITs, and an ACCT title is literally one of best ever 7 yr stretches. (And if you add the last 4 yrs of Buzz's tenure to that, you have unquestionably the best 11 yr stretch we've had in the modern history of the program.) These are, alas, the salad days lol. So, bemoaning that or celebrating it is our choice to make, always. I have mostly celebrated it up until precisely Jan 8, 2026, so hopefully I can get back to that. I hate being a grouch about VT MBB.
Posted: 03/06/2026 at 01:57 PM ET
(In response to this post by MidloHokie)

Thread Replies (21)

Full Thread →
Babcock says CMY is returning next season per Roanoke Times (link)**
WildTurkE 03/06/26 09:25 AM ET
Whit says he believes in Mike; the bigger
lazarus1 03/06/26 02:25 PM ET
The natural follow on question....
2hhoop3 03/06/26 02:32 PM ET
Why wouldn't he be?**
YBYSAIAHokie 03/06/26 10:39 AM ET
Well, in seven years he's going to be 7 or 8 games under .500 in the league
MidloHokie 03/06/26 11:01 AM ET
Yes, 100% of the time, for 2 reasons.
Gobbler-100 03/06/26 01:57 PM ET
Quick, name a VT coach who had a career above .500 record in the ACC**
GCHokie34 03/06/26 11:04 AM ET
Quick, let’s settle for mediocrity and .500 every year!!
cbhokie1 03/06/26 12:26 PM ET
Let's see... not Greenberg, not Buzz, not Young...**
HokieNL 03/06/26 11:14 AM ET
Annual Conference Winning % above .500
ShockWaveVT 03/06/26 11:31 AM ET
"Babcock says Friday comes after Thursday"**
GCHokie34 03/06/26 10:58 AM ET
and "weights weigh the same"**
HokieSA 03/06/26 12:15 PM ET
Whit Babcock says he believes in...(insert here Fuente 2020, Pry 2024) TIC
HokieRat 03/06/26 09:46 AM ET
There is no other sensible decision at this time then to
Vippie1 03/06/26 10:31 AM ET
Changes require strategy and investment
VT ChemE 1986 03/06/26 11:23 AM ET
Yep. Why try to succeed when we can stay "stable?" All the season ticket
King of Hokies 03/06/26 11:55 AM ET
You don’t think MY is trying to succeed? **
AnotherTechW 03/06/26 12:22 PM ET
The post was about the VT athletic department decisions, not about
King of Hokies 03/06/26 12:33 PM ET
Dude, if you think that VT can walk and chew gum at the same time you
VT ChemE 1986 03/06/26 02:01 PM ET
Lol, dude that's a lot of words you're trying to put in my mouth. Let me
King of Hokies 03/06/26 06:30 PM ET
Well said. As stock holders, our ROI has been awful for the last 15 years.
Hokester 03/07/26 09:28 AM ET
Agree. IIWII. I'm numb to it, and since I dropped my bball season tix
King of Hokies 03/06/26 10:53 AM ET