Sallis’s were more subtle that aren’t often called
He really only had one that should’ve been.
Both “block” calls vs Hammond were really really REALLY bad and obvious offensive fouls
Apparently it’s a point of emphasis not to give too many charge calls to the defense when they flop. Which is fine BUT as bad refs do…they go overboard the other way and forget what truly should be called a charge. At least 3 by Hildreth were charges. One by Tylaur vs Hammond was awful
** Edited by hokiepro at 1/19/2025, 12:51:28 PM
Thread Replies (8)
Should not a charge be called
-- DFCHokie
Jan 18, 2025 at 06:32 PM ET
DFCHokie
•
01/18/25 06:32 PM ET
Only to gain an advantage with contect
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2025 at 10:00 AM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/25 10:00 AM ET
I didnt notice with Sallis but not calling any on Hildreth was silly
-- hokietom87
Jan 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM ET
hokietom87
•
01/19/25 12:12 PM ET
Sallis’s were more subtle that aren’t often called
◄
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2025 at 12:50 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/25 12:50 PM ET
I agree on the Johnson v. Hammond call. Hammond had established legal
-- HokieEngineer
Jan 19, 2025 at 01:32 PM ET
HokieEngineer
•
01/19/25 01:32 PM ET
Realistically Hildreth should’ve been called for 2
-- hokiepro
Jan 19, 2025 at 01:38 PM ET
hokiepro
•
01/19/25 01:38 PM ET
Hildreth woulda fouled out if they had called all the no-call offensive
-- RJHokie
Jan 19, 2025 at 12:16 PM ET
RJHokie
•
01/19/25 12:16 PM ET
He delivered more "forearm shivers" on offense
-- saret
Jan 19, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET
saret
•
01/19/25 12:21 PM ET