All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

hokiepro
Joined: 10/07/1999
Posts: 115,775
Likes: 99,150
Founder Subscriber

Sallis’s were more subtle that aren’t often called

He really only had one that should’ve been. Both “block” calls vs Hammond were really really REALLY bad and obvious offensive fouls Apparently it’s a point of emphasis not to give too many charge calls to the defense when they flop. Which is fine BUT as bad refs do…they go overboard the other way and forget what truly should be called a charge. At least 3 by Hildreth were charges. One by Tylaur vs Hammond was awful ** Edited by hokiepro at 1/19/2025, 12:51:28 PM
Posted: 01/19/2025 at 12:50 PM ET
(In response to this post by hokietom87)

Thread Replies (8)

Full Thread →
Should not a charge be called
DFCHokie 01/18/25 06:32 PM ET
Only to gain an advantage with contect
hokiepro 01/19/25 10:00 AM ET
I didnt notice with Sallis but not calling any on Hildreth was silly
hokietom87 01/19/25 12:12 PM ET
Sallis’s were more subtle that aren’t often called
hokiepro 01/19/25 12:50 PM ET
I agree on the Johnson v. Hammond call. Hammond had established legal
HokieEngineer 01/19/25 01:32 PM ET
Realistically Hildreth should’ve been called for 2
hokiepro 01/19/25 01:38 PM ET
Hildreth woulda fouled out if they had called all the no-call offensive
RJHokie 01/19/25 12:16 PM ET
He delivered more "forearm shivers" on offense
saret 01/19/25 12:21 PM ET
Any time?**
Pride_and_Joy 01/19/25 09:29 AM ET