I agree on the Johnson v. Hammond call. Hammond had established legal

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Men's Basketball Board

Post #2124003 ◀ PREV NEXT ▶

Joined: 05/20/1999

Posts: 6,030

Likes: 4,054

HokieEngineer

guarding position, slid with Johnson, and then Johnson jumped sideways into him. That was a clear, obvious blown call. I thought the Hildreth v. Hammond one was an OK no-call, but wanted the offensive foul. The one before that where I don't remember the defender was a pretty clear chicken wing play. By the time we got to the Sallis/Hammond play, I'd given up on getting a call.

Posted: 01/19/2025 at 01:32 PM ET

(In response to this post by hokiepro)

Thread Replies (8)

Full Thread →

Should not a charge be called -- DFCHokie Jan 18, 2025 at 06:32 PM ET

DFCHokie • 01/18/25 06:32 PM ET

Only to gain an advantage with contect -- hokiepro Jan 19, 2025 at 10:00 AM ET

hokiepro • 01/19/25 10:00 AM ET

I didnt notice with Sallis but not calling any on Hildreth was silly -- hokietom87 Jan 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM ET

hokietom87 • 01/19/25 12:12 PM ET

Sallis’s were more subtle that aren’t often called -- hokiepro Jan 19, 2025 at 12:50 PM ET

hokiepro • 01/19/25 12:50 PM ET

I agree on the Johnson v. Hammond call. Hammond had established legal ◄ -- HokieEngineer Jan 19, 2025 at 01:32 PM ET

HokieEngineer • 01/19/25 01:32 PM ET

Realistically Hildreth should’ve been called for 2 -- hokiepro Jan 19, 2025 at 01:38 PM ET

hokiepro • 01/19/25 01:38 PM ET

Hildreth woulda fouled out if they had called all the no-call offensive -- RJHokie Jan 19, 2025 at 12:16 PM ET

RJHokie • 01/19/25 12:16 PM ET

He delivered more "forearm shivers" on offense -- saret Jan 19, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET

saret • 01/19/25 12:21 PM ET

Any time?** -- Pride_and_Joy Jan 19, 2025 at 09:29 AM ET

Pride_and_Joy • 01/19/25 09:29 AM ET