I've never taken seriously what anyone has said in public about NIL figures
Every single person in the process has a motive to lie about it
Players should lie to increase their perceived market value
Coaches should lie to both "show" what their players are getting for recruiting purposes plus "show" how out of control it is for the players they don't get
Collectives should lie to "show" they have more money in the coffers than what they really have...ditto for boosters
There's also a huge difference between:
Player X is getting $100k in NIL dollars
And
Player X is getting $100k specifically from School A's collective
Kansas doesn't get to claim Hunter Dickenson's national deals that he would get at any school. Arby's had a promotion to give NIL deals to RBs (get it?)...do those schools get to count that as money they've given out? Of course not
Is Lynn Kidd likely getting a significant NIL deal, more than what VT could produce? Probably, even very likely.
Is it likely it's close to what has been thrown around? No
But the perception matters. There's not a single person I would trust with a specific number on any NIL deal, and that includes Lynn Kidd himself. Everyone has incentive to lie
Thread Replies (4)
serious question just how far behind is
-- grtmmt
Mar 29, 2024 at 08:10 AM ET
grtmmt
•
03/29/24 08:10 AM ET
Remains to be seen if they’re actually leaving, think of it like your job
-- soflahokie
Mar 29, 2024 at 08:32 AM ET
soflahokie
•
03/29/24 08:32 AM ET
Pack is coming back to potentially not even start, he got $400k years ago
-- soflahokie
Mar 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM ET
soflahokie
•
03/29/24 10:32 AM ET
I've never taken seriously what anyone has said in public about NIL figures
◄
-- GCHokie34
Mar 29, 2024 at 10:32 AM ET
GCHokie34
•
03/29/24 10:32 AM ET