Much less what VT has been using/will use. But from a general standpoint, I think anyone representation of Woodson's would be against most language that isn't in a typical contract for endorsement and/or employment. If any one of us gets a DWI and our work finds out we would either face losing our job or being suspended. I think its the same here. Either his actions are detrimental enough to the VT brand (or any brand he endorses) that they drop him altogether, or they dont feel it rises to that level and he can be dealt with internally. I would be ok if VT felt Woodson should be released. I would be ok if VT felt Woodson should be dealt with internally. But I wouldnt be ok with some Frankenstein agreement where he loses all or part of his NIL payments but hes still a part of the team and just playing for free. Fans want there to be consequences...they just dont want to feel any of those consequences themselves. Make him play, but make him play for free. But that doesnt really line up with what's actually right for the situation