All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

HoHumHokie

HoHumHokie
2,321
Posts
1
Threads
302
Likes
Member since: October 13, 2005
Last post: 04/28/2022 11:29 AM ET
Twitter: @HoHumHokie

Posting History (47)

Does VT have the resources and financial strategy in place to put together

a competitive roster? I don't know what the guys leaving were making, but I don't think these guys will be missed if we can land some guys with length and athleticism, who can help at both ends of the court. The guys leaving were all pretty one-dimensional. Their strengths didn't out-weigh their weaknesses. ** Edited by HoHumHokie at 4/7/2026, 11:14:21 PM ** Edited by HoHumHokie at 4/7/2026, 11:15:01 PM

Nobody thought Miami was one of the 3 or 4 best at end of regular season.

The fact that a 10 seed is in the final is exactly why you want a 12+ team playoff.

Donavon Greene

What is the backstory on this transfer? Looks like he's probably 24 years old....he played in 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2024.

ACC Tournament in Massachusettes?

Do people in the northeast even know what Softball is? I see BC didn't qualify.

UConn

Whatever happened to the rumors of UConn to the ACC? Did that get squashed when the Pac12 folded? ACC could use UConn more than ever to help save basketball.

The biggest issue I saw down the ACC stretch was VT getting

out-hustled for 50/50 balls and our defenders getting beat off the dribble by quicker athletes. Maybe some of it was lack of grit or desire to put forth the extra effort. Strength and Conditioning needs to be a big focus this off-season. ** Edited by HoHumHokie at 3/21/2025, 12:38:35 PM ** Edited by HoHumHokie at 3/21/2025, 12:38:52 PM

Pedulla

Rough day for Pedulla, but that didn't deter him from nailing a game winning 3.

Rechsteiner (6'1") defending Stojakovich (6'7") all game

was comical. Stojakovich was literally the only scoring threat for Cal, so how did VT not have a better defensive gameplan?? ** Edited by HoHumHokie at 3/11/2025, 8:35:43 PM

Bracketology

Won't take long to figure out who the three teams are, but someone make sense of the seeding for me. Team A: Currently a 1 seed, 25-3 overall record, 6-3 record against teams considered for at-large bid, 12-3 record over last 15 games, 2 true road wins over teams considered for at-large bids, played 1 non-conf game (a home win) against ranked teams Team B: Currently a 2 seed, 23-4 overall record, 8-4 record against teams considered for at-large bid, 11-4 over last 15 games, 1 true road win over a team considered for at-large bid, played 2 non-conf games (home win, neutral site win) against ranked teams, lost to Team C twice Team C: Currently a 3 seed, 22-4 overall record, 8-4 record against teams considered for at-large bid, 13-2 over last 15 games, 4 true road wins over teams considered for at-large bid, played 2 non-conf games (away loss, neutral site loss) against ranked teams, beat Team B twice

Is parity or is everything watered down? Much medioctrity projected....

to make the NCAA tournament. 19 teams currently projected as at-large bids by Lunardi have double digit losses. Iowa State is currently a 5 seed with 12 losses?!?! Iowa is currently a 7 seed with 12 losses. WVU is a 9 seed with 13 losses. Oklahoma St is in with 14 losses. What am I missing?