Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Wrestling Board
◀ ▶
N
Joined: 10/26/2019
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 2,179
Nafeikoh

He's ranked in RPI and his win % is 74 I believe

Therefore he met 2 of the criteria.
Posted: 02/29/2024 at 06:43 PM ET
(In response to this post by emhokie)

Thread Replies (28)

Full Thread →
Here are the conf allocations...**
TheStateGuy • 02/29/24 03:18 PM ET
The ACC total looks low relative to B12 and EIWA
UpperQuad • 02/29/24 06:13 PM ET
Points of vunrability
DrExSuess • 02/29/24 05:14 PM ET
28 total seems low. In past recent years, I think it was in the 30s.**
dallasvt • 02/29/24 05:06 PM ET
Here's a good link that shows specifically who earned bids for the conf**
TheStateGuy • 02/29/24 04:01 PM ET
Help!! Does this mean allocated wrestlers are IN no matter.....
wasris • 02/29/24 04:17 PM ET
No, they are not guaranteed….
hokietony • 02/29/24 04:22 PM ET
Thank you. So neither Matthews nor Crook received an allocation at 141**
133966Hokie • 02/29/24 04:06 PM ET
I think Mathews earned an allocation but not crook**
emhokie • 02/29/24 04:31 PM ET
Nope - don’t think so - look at link StateGuy provided above
133966Hokie • 02/29/24 05:05 PM ET
Gotcha. I was looking at the wrong sheet
emhokie • 02/29/24 06:13 PM ET
Matthews win % kept him out
Nafeikoh • 02/29/24 05:47 PM ET
I still don't understand how Crook didn't get a pre-allocation.
nvpbrown • 03/01/24 12:24 AM ET
How in the heck did the hoo earn a spot?**
emhokie • 02/29/24 06:14 PM ET
He's ranked in RPI and his win % is 74 I believe ◄
Nafeikoh • 02/29/24 06:43 PM ET
That’s interesting **
emhokie • 02/29/24 07:07 PM ET
Isn’t it a very analytical process for the allocations?**
hokietony • 02/29/24 11:17 PM ET
I thought it’s supposed to be and that’s seems to be the PR behind it
emhokie • 03/01/24 09:50 AM ET
So we're vulnerable....141
wasris • 02/29/24 03:54 PM ET
Whoever doesn't earn a bid will almost certainly get an at-large.
Hokiemacho • 02/29/24 10:30 PM ET
How tf does 141 only get 3?
Hikinghokie • 02/29/24 03:28 PM ET
The Big Ten took 11 allocations at 141. What a joke.
samistone • 02/29/24 03:32 PM ET
141 w/3 is criminal - all 4 are Top 13 guys!**
133966Hokie • 02/29/24 04:04 PM ET
Neither matthews or crook ….
hokietony • 02/29/24 04:16 PM ET
Yep - and Holden Heller did not earn one at 165
133966Hokie • 02/29/24 04:23 PM ET
The ACC got hosed at 141
emhokie • 02/29/24 03:48 PM ET
They should be a lock for an at large bid
Hikinghokie • 02/29/24 03:51 PM ET
Just about a lock.**
hokietony • 02/29/24 03:59 PM ET
Yikes. 3 at 141 and 2 at 165 are both gut punches. **
samistone • 02/29/24 03:28 PM ET