D
Joined:
12/08/2020
Posts:
2,422
Likes:
4,373
It will be interesting with a wrestling RTC compared to other sports
Athletes receiving money from a collective should theoretically see a drastic change, but the athletes receiving money from an RTC have a different standard set by USA Wrestling. You can use the justification that our athletes are receiving money to be a part of the RTC to develop them for international competition. Just last year we had a backup competing internationally until Cooper Flynn replaced our injured 125. SERTC money has never really been "NIL" it's more about the tie in with USA Wrestling - which makes a pay for play loophole seem very easy to exploit.
Thread Replies (8)
Regarding Giving Day....I assume SERTC is still the best way to give to
-- RRHokie90
Feb 19, 2025 at 07:57 AM ET
RRHokie90
•
02/19/25 07:57 AM ET
Yes it has the most direct impact.
-- Hokiemacho
Feb 19, 2025 at 01:43 PM ET
Hokiemacho
•
02/19/25 01:43 PM ET
I wonder how rev share changes this in the near future
-- Hikinghokie
Feb 19, 2025 at 04:49 PM ET
Hikinghokie
•
02/19/25 04:49 PM ET
Yes, as I understand NIL deals would have a clearing house.
-- TheFacts
Feb 19, 2025 at 05:14 PM ET
TheFacts
•
02/19/25 05:14 PM ET
It will be interesting with a wrestling RTC compared to other sports
◄
-- donjfs3
Feb 19, 2025 at 06:14 PM ET
donjfs3
•
02/19/25 06:14 PM ET
Curious about your statement 'different standard set by USA Wrestling'
-- radhokie1
Feb 20, 2025 at 08:55 AM ET
radhokie1
•
02/20/25 08:55 AM ET
An RTC isn't a collective it's a program developed by USA Wrestling
-- donjfs3
Feb 20, 2025 at 02:54 PM ET
donjfs3
•
02/20/25 02:54 PM ET
Donated to SERTC in the spirit of Giving Day...**
-- RRHokie90
Feb 19, 2025 at 02:11 PM ET
RRHokie90
•
02/19/25 02:11 PM ET