J
Joined:
09/19/2002
Posts:
1,260
Likes:
140
For 1, it was hard to tell from the camera angle
But I thought they were challenging if he got back past 90 degrees before the 3 count. But it was definitely a big 3 points, for sure.
For 2, it happens a lot in the scrambles they get into these days. I don't think gaj was doing it as defense, his opponent was trying to put him there. The rule causes people to try to roll, shift their grip, etc, which usually leads to position changes and more scrambling, rather than just laying there waiting for a stalemate..
Thread Replies (8)
Time for my yearly ignorant wrestling-viewer post where I need your help...
-- hokiegal23
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:40 AM ET
hokiegal23
•
03/21/26 11:40 AM ET
Neutral danger, a rule they added a few years ago
-- jofus13
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:47 AM ET
jofus13
•
03/21/26 11:47 AM ET
Thanks for all the answers... 2 follow-ups now...
-- hokiegal23
Mar 21, 2026 at 12:12 PM ET
hokiegal23
•
03/21/26 12:12 PM ET
For 1 it looked correct but it was close enough to challenge
-- donjfs3
Mar 21, 2026 at 04:18 PM ET
donjfs3
•
03/21/26 04:18 PM ET
For 1, it was hard to tell from the camera angle
◄
-- jofus13
Mar 21, 2026 at 12:24 PM ET
jofus13
•
03/21/26 12:24 PM ET
Hard to tell from the camera angle, the ref had been starting & restarting
-- HokieToph
Mar 21, 2026 at 12:15 PM ET
HokieToph
•
03/21/26 12:15 PM ET
I think it was a neutral danger call**
-- Hokiefan94
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:46 AM ET
Hokiefan94
•
03/21/26 11:46 AM ET
NCAA implemented a "neutral danger" count a few years ago to compensate for
-- HokieToph
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:46 AM ET
HokieToph
•
03/21/26 11:46 AM ET
Gaj's back was <90 degrees for three seconds in neutral.
-- Nafeikoh
Mar 21, 2026 at 11:45 AM ET
Nafeikoh
•
03/21/26 11:45 AM ET