All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

J
Joined: 09/19/2002
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 140

For 1, it was hard to tell from the camera angle

But I thought they were challenging if he got back past 90 degrees before the 3 count. But it was definitely a big 3 points, for sure. For 2, it happens a lot in the scrambles they get into these days. I don't think gaj was doing it as defense, his opponent was trying to put him there. The rule causes people to try to roll, shift their grip, etc, which usually leads to position changes and more scrambling, rather than just laying there waiting for a stalemate..
Posted: 03/21/2026 at 12:24 PM ET
(In response to this post by hokiegal23)

Thread Replies (8)

Full Thread →
Time for my yearly ignorant wrestling-viewer post where I need your help...
hokiegal23 03/21/26 11:40 AM ET
Neutral danger, a rule they added a few years ago
jofus13 03/21/26 11:47 AM ET
Thanks for all the answers... 2 follow-ups now...
hokiegal23 03/21/26 12:12 PM ET
For 1 it looked correct but it was close enough to challenge
donjfs3 03/21/26 04:18 PM ET
For 1, it was hard to tell from the camera angle
jofus13 03/21/26 12:24 PM ET
Hard to tell from the camera angle, the ref had been starting & restarting
HokieToph 03/21/26 12:15 PM ET
I think it was a neutral danger call**
Hokiefan94 03/21/26 11:46 AM ET
NCAA implemented a "neutral danger" count a few years ago to compensate for
HokieToph 03/21/26 11:46 AM ET
Gaj's back was <90 degrees for three seconds in neutral.
Nafeikoh 03/21/26 11:45 AM ET