Lost by one point (inside).
Ventresca +3
Campbell -3
Crook +10
Nininger +8
Gaj -15
Burton -3
Desiante -7
Bullock -8
Sasso +10
Mullen +4
If we had that extra point, I think we would have won on a single nearfall point (Niniger got 4NF, Bullock gave up 3NF).
** Edited by nvpbrown at 11/16/2025, 12:57:40 PM
Thread Replies (9)
I have us up 67-64 in match points... so if we win 285 we win. Lets go
-- larhokie
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:44 PM ET
larhokie
•
11/16/25 12:44 PM ET
Sorry we are down 64-67... we need Mullins to win by 3. Then next criteria**
-- larhokie
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:47 PM ET
larhokie
•
11/16/25 12:47 PM ET
The Sasso score might be off... I have it 12-2... which means this is a tie**
-- larhokie
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:52 PM ET
larhokie
•
11/16/25 12:52 PM ET
Lost by one point (inside).
◄
-- nvpbrown
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:56 PM ET
nvpbrown
•
11/16/25 12:56 PM ET
Desiante was 13-7. Only last by 6 not 7. That is our extra point.**
-- larhokie
Nov 16, 2025 at 01:09 PM ET
larhokie
•
11/16/25 01:09 PM ET
Which I think is hear fall. I am not sure who leads on that.**
-- larhokie
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:47 PM ET
larhokie
•
11/16/25 12:47 PM ET
Isn't the tech fall a higher criteria for Illinois?**
-- hokietony
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:45 PM ET
hokietony
•
11/16/25 12:45 PM ET
No, only real falls (and defaults) count.**
-- nvpbrown
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:46 PM ET
nvpbrown
•
11/16/25 12:46 PM ET
Okay, Google AI suggests otherwise but I don't know.**
-- hokietony
Nov 16, 2025 at 12:47 PM ET
hokietony
•
11/16/25 12:47 PM ET