When we argued for the “interference” based on a fake tag by the Duke 2B
why the hell didn’t they review it? As someone noted below, fake tags are illegal and considered a form of interference. If one of the umps didn’t see it in real time, but the video replays we could see are pretty obvious and Pete/Mike were insistent that it happened, why not take a look?
Posted: 03/13/2026 at 10:47 PM ET
Thread Replies (5)
When we argued for the “interference” based on a fake tag by the Duke 2B
◄
-- HolidayInnHokie
Mar 13, 2026 at 10:47 PM ET
HolidayInnHokie
•
03/13/26 10:47 PM ET
If intentional that was a very tacky little league move!**
-- MDHokie79
Mar 14, 2026 at 09:04 AM ET
MDHokie79
•
03/14/26 09:04 AM ET
I understand the penalty for that is a warning to the fielder. While
-- nkhooch
Mar 14, 2026 at 02:44 AM ET
nkhooch
•
03/14/26 02:44 AM ET
I believe that is considered obstruction
-- VTChip
Mar 14, 2026 at 08:47 AM ET
VTChip
•
03/14/26 08:47 AM ET
Ok, then the info I got was incorrect. Thought it was a reliable source.
-- nkhooch
Mar 15, 2026 at 02:11 AM ET
nkhooch
•
03/15/26 02:11 AM ET
Likely because Pete didn't argue heavily. He was likely fishing
-- VAHokie89
Mar 13, 2026 at 11:16 PM ET
VAHokie89
•
03/13/26 11:16 PM ET