The committee changed the rules during the process that had been agreed upon beforehand…1 they didn’t give equal weighting or consideration to KPI & DSR which they were supposed to consider as much as RPI not favoring one over the others. She changed that, they changed to the quadrant seeding which was too much extra to add to confusion. Committee members lie. They say whatever they can to get media off their backs. If you don’t know that you’ve either not followed NCAA Committees over the years or are naive. The chair person just is the mouthpiece who covers their butts for their questionable decisions. The UCLA over FSU seeding was not defensible logically because they were so close but FSU won head to head and had 2 concert titles