All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

V
Joined: 12/16/2001
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 19,906
Lifetime

Sorry just responding. Have been tied up today. While I was just

speculating as an alternative to monies that could go other places, there are some advantages to trimming to 75 (should we ever decide to do it). And some of this depends on what comes down the pike re: distribution of revenue sharing (several issues with this), and eventual contracts for players (how long they are committed to being here). We aren't sure how the revenue distribution will impact an entire department. Do we have to distribute per sport? Does football revenue still need to be spread over some other sports? How does Title IX impact this? Just lots of unknowns still. It is easy for the House settlement to say each Power 4 school needs to share $22-$26M dollars annually, but hard to untangle so many questions as to the how's and where's. There is also some discussion to reducing rosters anyways, and we are moving towards a more pro like football environment. NFL rosters currently are 53 players, with (I believe) 16 players on a practice squad. That is 69 players (and I realize an NFL team can sign anyone from another teams practice squad). And I am not suggesting the NFL roster format. But, I think 75 is very doable. Part two of a 75 man roster, you can maximize your revenue distribution (on a higher per capita basis per man). You can get more bang for the buck. If the sport goes to contracts, the transfer out scenario changes dramatically. We now know what the roster would look like so that bet becomes hedged. I think you still will have enough roster room to add transfers if needed. The JMU's of the world are going to have a harder time handling the "bright lights appeal" of the new revenue sharing model around the Power 4 level. I also think the days of keeping a roster of 85 and being able to properly develop all of them are slowly going away. Just don't see that the patience is there anymore (from both the coaching staff and the players). It is also more cumbersome with "keeping guys engaged" in future plans. I am not saying this will happen, but think that COULD be an option for us and we could survive fine being down 10 overall scholarships. I am quite certain, however, we will be increasing scholarships to some of the other sports, and that will be part of an interesting financial scenario for us (and everyone) to navigate. We do have some "room" in our current budget to add expenses, and the new CFP payouts will give us approx. $14M per year. Will be interesting to see what we end up doing. ** Edited by VTScoop at 5/25/2024, 3:41:37 PM
Posted: 05/25/2024 at 03:12 PM ET
(In response to this post by st_andrew)

Thread Replies (32)

Full Thread →
Here's an interesting twist on the NCAA settlement
VTChip 05/24/24 10:53 PM ET
Fully expect us to match what our peers decide to do here, at least with
VTScoop 05/24/24 11:58 PM ET
I would disagree on the football scollies- I think we would stick with the
sacramento hokie 05/25/24 01:38 PM ET
IIRC, Duke (private school) currently has an advantage with schollies for
IB4TECH 05/25/24 11:18 AM ET
Yes, privates and any public that has large endowment dollars that can help
VTScoop 05/25/24 03:31 PM ET
They give free tuition to all lower income students
UpperQuad 05/25/24 03:09 PM ET
Curious to why you think 85 scholarships is more than we need for football
st_andrew 05/25/24 08:31 AM ET
Sorry just responding. Have been tied up today. While I was just
VTScoop 05/25/24 03:12 PM ET
WRT the NFL's roster, the 53-man is the active roster. However, the NFL
VTHokie2000 05/25/24 06:16 PM ET
FCS schools play football with 63 on the roster
UpperQuad 05/25/24 10:56 AM ET
Keep in mind FCS football scholarships are equivalent, so technically a
VTHokie2000 05/25/24 06:13 PM ET
Think what could be done with those 22 other scholarships.**
laphroaig 05/25/24 01:39 PM ET
Sharing revenue will cause rosters and scholarships to be reduced. There's
laphroaig 05/25/24 10:21 AM ET
In-state Tuition
HLTW! 05/25/24 08:20 AM ET
Have not heard how the progress on that front has gone. I need to
VTScoop 05/25/24 03:20 PM ET
Great post. That is a huge disadvantage for Virginia schools**
VTChip 05/25/24 10:58 AM ET
My biggest fear is cutting scholarships for Men’s Olympic Sports, are you
Stech 05/25/24 08:00 AM ET
Sorry for any confusion, I am saying Olympic sports would be getting more
VTScoop 05/25/24 03:26 PM ET
your last sentence says it all Chip
gelded turkey 05/24/24 11:20 PM ET
Mr. Chip
rberry7676 05/24/24 11:17 PM ET
NFL teams have like 45 players. Why should CFB be different?
Jethro Tull 05/25/24 09:51 PM ET
Valid point**
rberry7676 05/25/24 11:03 PM ET
Yeah, but they also have practice players, the waiver wire,
RJHokie 05/25/24 10:34 PM ET
The number may be high......
2hhoop3 05/25/24 10:26 PM ET
Really? CFB is just a farm system for the NFL
Jethro Tull 05/26/24 03:53 PM ET
Yes really......
2hhoop3 05/26/24 04:32 PM ET
Been saying for years - limit football rosters and scholarships to 70.
laphroaig 05/25/24 05:32 AM ET
I don't really disagree with your thoughts
VTChip 05/24/24 11:44 PM ET
As you say, 20 or less is fine for softball.
RJHokie 05/24/24 11:24 PM ET
Another factor - most pro athletes play one specific position.
laphroaig 05/25/24 06:10 AM ET
It worked for Weaver . . . **
MidloHokie 05/25/24 09:06 AM ET
I can appreciate that response
rberry7676 05/24/24 11:35 PM ET
CBS Sports with a similar story
VTChip 05/24/24 10:58 PM ET