All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

HokieAl HokieAl OP
Jun 26, 2026 at 04:27 PM ET
For your viewing and consideration, revenue comparison of VT vs FBS
All revenue data is sourced from the Knight-Newhouse college athletics database. Data shown below is for the most recent public records for the 2024-2025 fiscal year. This is total revenue for the athletic department at each public school. Edited because I forgot to turn off a filter and left off a couple of teams the first time. ** Edited by HokieAl at 6/26/2026, 5:16:05 PM ** Edited by HokieAl at 6/26/2026, 11:04:25 PM

12 Replies

S
Stech
1mo
Graph is accurate, but outdated. ~$100M more in the 25-26 in last 6 months
than 24-25 numbers and it probably puts us in the top 10 right now. Add in a new coach, a new AD who was personally recommended by Jimmy Sexton (the most powerful agent in college sports) specifically as a revenue generator, a new football CEO coming, and a new University President that the BOV is hiring with a clear mandate to compete at the top 10 level — and the trajectory here is hard to argue with. The future is a lot brighter than that graph suggests IMHO. ** Edited by Stech at 6/27/2026, 11:59:36 PM
HokieAl HokieAl OP
1mo
These are the most recently reported tax data, submitted spring 2026
So it is the most current verifiable information across all schools. Of course VT is starting to get more money, but others are increasing also. So the data has to be consistently updated across all schools to be useful. And for that purpose, this is the most current data that anyone outside of the athletic departments will have.
S
Stech
1mo
Absolutely, great job on most current. Haven’t heard of others getting 100M
If there are others, it can’t be many, as like Virginia Tech you shot it from the rooftops, even if they are anonymous gifts. ** Edited by Stech at 6/28/2026, 11:37:43 AM
M
marcbvtgm
1mo
MSU & KU w/ $401M & $300M gifts recently. Still $100M isn't chump change.
** Edited by marcbvtgm at 6/28/2026, 9:16:36 PM
S
Stech
1mo
LOL 100M is chump change for Athletics, nahhh!!!
B
Big12 guy
1mo
VT is making the right moves. Anyone that is
paying attention can see that. Revenue is a better metric today on being able to compete - a whole lot better than the academic rankings. Even Memphis got a commitment for $25M a year from one private source. There are others as well, including KU.
S
Stech
1mo
Hearing many more are ready to invest in Hokie Ventures LLC, not donate
invest. Instead of PE firms investing in sports, individuals and companies are looking to jump on board. Interesting times to say the very least.
B
Big12 guy
1mo
Utah and KU are doing the same. People are watching to see
if that model will work - and it gives locals a way of investing into the growing pie. A win win.
HokieAl HokieAl OP
1mo
and keep in mind that some are spending far above their revenue numbers
There are plenty of ways to spend more than the revenue you make. The below is just a snapshot of one fiscal year, but it clearly shows how some are aggressively spending.
E
EDGEMAN
1mo
Bama running a $32.6M surplus?
Guess they think they should hold cash...do they not have any facilities that need upgrading?
B
Big12 guy
1mo
Good info, and
very interesting. In my weak research, Louisville and Kansas always surprise me with their revenue or "worth", but they do not show up in your graphic as being particularly strong. Just for chts and kicks, I thought you would be interested in the operating income graphic of the 2024 NFL season. link below
3
33laszlo99
1mo
Thanks for posting this. Graphic info is not the final answer. But it
provides the skeleton to be fleshed out with discussion. It's the best starting point.