All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

S
SMU Pony OP
Sep 10, 2025 at 07:59 PM ET
Michigan State @ USC at 11 p.m. ET
Yet another bright, flashing indicator of how stupid conference realignment is. Terrible for the fans and I'd have to think it's not great for viewership as many MSU fans will likely tune out for such a late game. What are we doing?

11 Replies

H
harlote101
10mo
After seeing what was a horrid outcome
Thanks I will be watching this game When it airs on the 20th ** Edited by harlote101 at 9/14/2025, 1:46:26 AM
S
Stech
10mo
Look forward to seeing the viewership numbers, also MSt players playing
that late impact. It’s not like a bowl game where they go out there usually a week early and adjust to the time zone.
H
HokiesACC2004
10mo
My opinion, better than what you expect
B
Big12 guy
10mo
One of the prices MSU has to pay for the money
that USC brought to their media contract. I have zero sympathy, and if it was my school playing USC, I would not complain, I'd try to attend the game.
reestuart reestuart
10mo
Cool matchup, but they wouldn't schedule it if people wouldn't watch.
All of these schools want the TV money. The networks want live content. This is what everyone was asking for, whether the fans like it or not.
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
10mo
Eh is it really that different than when an East Coast team decides to play
Midnight Madness game in college basketball or when ESPN holds its 24-hour college basketball marathon during the week (i.e. Tuesday-Wednesday or Wednesday-Thursday)?
H
hokietony
10mo
It is different in that this game is being played at 8 pm at the game .....
do we penalize the home team's likely desire to play a night game just because the away team is 3 time zones away. ** Edited by hokietony at 9/11/2025, 9:05:41 AM
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
10mo
Yes, you are correct in that regard. However, since the East Coast is the
most valuable time zone from a ratings perspective and ratings will likely matter in an uneven pay distribution, it likely won't change the perspective of the East Coast viewer regardless of where the game is actually played.
B
Big12 guy
10mo
Which is why uneven conference distributions based
on viewership is a non starter. Post season is the distributions the conference need to amend. Let the schools keep 75 - 80% of any post season revenue, and the problem is solved. A school for the most part does not control which conference they are in, who they can play, or which time zone or slot they get. They can however, invest the money it takes for a competitive program, so let them reap those rewards.
VTHokie2000 VTHokie2000
10mo
The conferences need their cut of the money too. How else would the top
brass in the conference be able to afford a vacation home? ;-) For the record, I do agree with you that the schools need to receive a larger portion of the revenue. Not sure it will happen those because it is very easy for people to discover that they have a little Gordon Gekko in them.
Maroon Baboon Maroon Baboon
10mo
I'd watch it. But I'm built different.
I was a Pac-12 After Dark guy every week. That being said, I'm not watching this because I am turned off to the P2 duopoly, not because of the late start here in the ETZ.