Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
wwhokie1
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 5,030
wwhokie1
Subscriber

My thoughts were that at the time the ACC liked the idea of 20 years, at

least most of the schools did. It wasn't just something that ESPN wanted. With fears of schools leaving because we didn't have a network, having a 20 year GOR and finally a network brought stability that everyone was seeking. The finances didn't look so out of whack back then and everyone thought now that we have a network we will start to move to fairly equal footing with the SEC and Big 10. With the new network we had solved our money shortfall, and with the GOR we solidified the conference makeup. All was right with the football world, at least until we saw the real numbers we were getting and compared them to the increasing figures of other conferences. So my rememberance is that 20 years of GOR actually brought peace and tranquility to the conferance and fans because we no longer needed to worry about any teams leaving. ** Edited by wwhokie1 at 5/20/2023, 12:30:47 AM
Posted: 05/20/2023 at 12:28 AM ET
(In response to this post by Will Stewart)

Thread Replies (46)

Full Thread →
Question about the GOR.
Will StewartAdmin • 05/19/23 10:59 AM ET
The ACC has clung to their ACC Basketball past for way too long. Football
JKHokie-RunFor32 • 05/20/23 11:08 AM ET
My thoughts were that at the time the ACC liked the idea of 20 years, at ◄
wwhokie1 • 05/20/23 12:28 AM ET
Negotiate it how, with ESPN holding the cards?
TerryD • 05/19/23 09:52 PM ET
What's worse...ACC GOR or VT's Nike contract? TIC**
MP4VT2004 • 05/19/23 08:54 PM ET
The critical element (that isn't public) is the language of the TV contract
daveinop • 05/19/23 05:15 PM ET
apologize, I see CMU and Tarheelblue have most of it covered.
daveinop • 05/19/23 05:19 PM ET
Blame the Turtle **
VaTechHokiesACC • 05/19/23 02:38 PM ET
Spear the turtle.**
jmanatVT • 05/19/23 03:08 PM ET
I disagree with the implied presumption
LeadingEdge • 05/19/23 01:07 PM ET
Even though the ACC is on par with the Big XII and Pac-12 in terms of the
VTHokie2000 • 05/19/23 03:44 PM ET
But there's no guarantee that the Pac-12 or Big 12 will get more money.
tarheelblue • 05/19/23 04:50 PM ET
It is also possible the the B10 is over paid, as the networks need to make
Big12 guy • 05/20/23 09:27 AM ET
It doesn't matter if there is no guarantee though because at least the
VTHokie2000 • 05/19/23 05:48 PM ET
I think it was designed to guarantee "stability"
CobbCountyHokie • 05/19/23 01:06 PM ET
I think part of it is/was just a mindset
RTFC • 05/19/23 12:43 PM ET
Because the ACC was over eager and overconfident
HokieAl • 05/19/23 12:33 PM ET
There was no choice. If the ACC was going to survive it needed a network
ColumbusHokie • 05/19/23 12:08 PM ET
Length of deal not necessarily the problem
CMU Hokie • 05/19/23 11:44 AM ET
At least periodic "look ins" would help.**
Atlee Hokie • 05/19/23 01:20 PM ET
The current ACC contract has 3 "look-ins". The first was apparently in 2021
tarheelblue • 05/19/23 04:44 PM ET
Thank you. Ok - so what happened at the 2021 look-in?**
133966Hokie • 05/19/23 06:19 PM ET
Covid **
Stech • 05/19/23 07:48 PM ET
Also focus on locking down Comcast.
HOO86 • 05/19/23 11:22 PM ET
All good points.**
Stech • 05/20/23 02:00 PM ET
Just unlucky on the timing 🤷‍♂️**
Stech • 05/19/23 07:49 PM ET
Better luck next time. 2026 is only 3 years away.**
tarheelblue • 05/19/23 08:11 PM ET
Timing for 2021.....
2hhoop3 • 05/19/23 11:44 PM ET
Thank you!!!!..........
2hhoop3 • 05/19/23 05:21 PM ET
Glad there are look ins.**
Atlee Hokie • 05/19/23 05:05 PM ET
Good info.**
RJHokie • 05/19/23 04:57 PM ET
Perhaps Maryland affected
Roanokie • 05/19/23 11:38 AM ET
Maryland leaving was a canary in the coalmine.
mancunian • 05/19/23 12:05 PM ET
You're right....
2hhoop3 • 05/19/23 01:56 PM ET
Maybe 20 years ago, the DC City Paper did a big story
mancunian • 05/19/23 02:25 PM ET
I read and remember.......
2hhoop3 • 05/19/23 05:47 PM ET
Length of contract will be the cause of the demise of the ACC.
manassashoo • 05/19/23 11:24 AM ET
Swofford was (as the Brits would say) so far out of his depth ...
Atlee Hokie • 05/19/23 01:18 PM ET
He sure did a good job keeping Raycom fed for as long as possible**
HokieAl • 05/19/23 01:38 PM ET
He had his son advising him what to do.**
Atlee Hokie • 05/19/23 01:42 PM ET
Good question and there are.......
2hhoop3 • 05/19/23 11:22 AM ET
ESPN was playing chess and Swofford was playing Chutes and Ladders.**
Lakeridgehokie • 05/19/23 11:15 AM ET
It must have been a combination of Swofford believing without the network
RoswellGAHokie • 05/19/23 11:13 AM ET
Swofford had no negotiating power imo.
Brewing_Hokie • 05/19/23 11:10 AM ET
The ACC was in a position of weakness and it was a desperation move.
tarheelblue • 05/19/23 12:58 PM ET
Truth.
RJHokie • 05/19/23 01:23 PM ET
Yup as I said Swofford had no negotiating power.
Brewing_Hokie • 05/19/23 01:14 PM ET