Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
W
Joined: 11/28/2012
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 478
WarHog38

Change

I wonder about this extreme change in college football coupled with dramatic changes elsewhere. Barred here from factually relating those areas of change. Would be on any sport's board. So this will just concern football. Why the changes? NIL, an instantaneous Transfer Portal versus the old one year wait and one year loss of eligibility. Plus the apparently upcoming wholesale expansion boom. The expansion can be wrote off to greed which is an inborn timeless fallacy within humanity. However why the NIL & Transfer Portal creations? What was the pressure or the inherent drive to do that? There was none. It appears as just tools to wreck our sport and it will probably will do so. Coaches already have to play doting father roles to get the best efforts of athletes. Now are they going have to make sure everybody drives a high priced sport's car and has a gold necklace to get them working hard on the practice field? Those athletes are too young for that. It is going to ruin the college sport.
Posted: 08/02/2022 at 05:31 PM ET
(In response to this post by hokieZ71)

Thread Replies (49)

Full Thread →
Loads of comments by Sankey today on ESPN
hokieZ71 • 08/02/22 02:49 PM ET
Unfortunately the Golden Rule applies. Those with the gold make the rules.**
Hokester • 08/03/22 01:55 PM ET
Hard to tell what is......
2hhoop3 • 08/02/22 08:59 PM ET
ESPN's pushing Sankey as a "victim" & Fox's pushing the B1G as Civil Rights
Stech • 08/02/22 07:15 PM ET
I like Sen. Murphy discussion in the article. Let big schools become feeder
cricket77 • 08/02/22 06:34 PM ET
A little naïve of him to think that's possible
hokieZ71 • 08/03/22 08:40 AM ET
That is my observation of where this will end up**
VTCALS72 • 08/03/22 08:07 AM ET
Academic football will only be for D-2 and D-3....
Old Line Hokie • 08/02/22 06:59 PM ET
What is academic football?**
33laszlo99 • 08/03/22 11:18 AM ET
Ask cricket77. Just responding to his post.**
Old Line Hokie • 08/03/22 11:30 AM ET
But will there be any remaining D1 schools? Could be that D-1
VTCALS72 • 08/03/22 08:09 AM ET
Can the DI schools afford to pay players for all the sports they sponsor?**
VTHokie2000 • 08/02/22 07:18 PM ET
They certainly can if they choose to allocate the money across all sports
HokieToph • 08/03/22 12:15 PM ET
Legally the schools may not have a choice in the matter because I believe
VTHokie2000 • 08/03/22 08:55 PM ET
It does not appear possible.**
VTCALS72 • 08/03/22 09:27 AM ET
I don't know. Depends on the school's revenue...
Old Line Hokie • 08/02/22 07:49 PM ET
You could pay 100 athletes 100k for what Kirby Smart is making alone.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 11:52 AM ET
Tell us what you really think about non-rev Olympic sports! **
133743Hokie • 08/03/22 01:01 PM ET
What i REALLY think is REALITY.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 03:48 PM ET
Mentioned below. How come Fball and Bball coaches make millions more/yr?
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 08:03 AM ET
Except your reality may not be a realistic one given that all schools
VTHokie2000 • 08/03/22 09:52 PM ET
Disagree. Bball and Fball aren’t gonna be under the same umbrella as Tennis
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 12:16 AM ET
It doesn't matter what the pro leagues do because they don't receive
VTHokie2000 • 08/04/22 02:19 AM ET
I get all that, but while the lawsuits would come both ways.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 08:02 AM ET
Again a player's "worth" has nothing to do with it as long as the school
VTHokie2000 • 08/04/22 09:12 AM ET
What about coaches? They all paid equally?**
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 10:12 AM ET
The reason it is tougher to prove for coaches and most professions is they
VTHokie2000 • 08/04/22 11:39 AM ET
WTH? So, these young impressionable kids shouldn’t earn a fare wage?
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 01:05 PM ET
It isn't a one or the other situation because you keep ignoring the role
VTHokie2000 • 08/04/22 03:55 PM ET
Title IX will have a say on which sports the schools will be able to
VTHokie2000 • 08/02/22 08:26 PM ET
Does Title IX even apply? We're talking paid employees. Different ballgame
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 04:06 PM ET
Yes, I believe Title IX would still apply based on the original purpose of
VTHokie2000 • 08/03/22 08:41 PM ET
Players are employees of paid. Reason why Pry’s highest paid employee at VT**
BBBDatVT_ • 08/04/22 08:07 AM ET
Title IX is the 🐘 in the room that no one is talking about on pay for play**
Stech • 08/02/22 08:56 PM ET
Exactly which is why I think if the schools want to start paying the
VTHokie2000 • 08/02/22 09:14 PM ET
Completely agree. This is the issue that will likely end the College notion**
ColumbusHokie • 08/03/22 07:05 AM ET
Even if the athletic departments are spun off as independent entities, I do
VTHokie2000 • 08/03/22 08:50 PM ET
Change ◄
WarHog38 • 08/02/22 05:31 PM ET
There were lawsuits by players that forced NIL and Transfer.
4x4hokies • 08/02/22 06:23 PM ET
Court
WarHog38 • 08/02/22 06:35 PM ET
Ask the very conservative Supreme Court. They LOL'ed at the old system.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 11:27 AM ET
Millions
WarHog38 • 08/03/22 11:50 AM ET
don't they only get one free transfer? Only change is that they don't
reestuart • 08/03/22 04:18 PM ET
Un-Limited
WarHog38 • 08/03/22 09:26 PM ET
If anything, outright paying them, will result in less transfers.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 03:49 PM ET
The legal change occurred because players
Pylons • 08/03/22 07:13 AM ET
It can be argued that collective greed screwed college football, not courts
hokieZ71 • 08/02/22 07:13 PM ET
Dude this was a BIG corrupt business back in the 80s.
BBBDatVT_ • 08/03/22 11:41 AM ET
Court said NCAA can't sell what (name, image, likeness) it doesn't own.
daveinop • 08/02/22 07:06 PM ET
Like Swarbrick said, there will be two spheres of influence
goldendomer • 08/02/22 03:27 PM ET