Wasted 30 minutes of my life so you don't have to. He said UNC/UVA are in his words "joined at the hip" to leave the ACC because of their academics, are on the same page about every major ACC decision and being the South's oldest rivalry. He thinks UNC will get UVA into SEC/BIG. Right off the bat you know he made everything up because UNC and UVA have been on opposite sides of every major conference move the last 20 years. UVA took the lead in suing FSU/Clemson, was instrumental in getting the votes for SMU and Calford and voted for VT joining (admittedly not 100% voluntarily). Meanwhile UNC was absolutely against all of it. UVA's leadership have said only positive things about the ACC and condemned FSU/Clemson. UNC higher ups have said the opposite. Also UNC/UVA is not the South's oldest rivalry. UGA and Auburn started playing each other earlier and played the same number of games. No one at UNC or UVA cares about their "rivalry." VT is UVA's biggest rival by far and the only school that they care about. For UNC there are at least 3 bigger rivalries and all of them are more joined to UNC's hip than UVA. Finally, let's just assume for fun it's true that UNC and UVA are "joined at the hip." No one in the SEC/BIG cares. They're not going to let rookie UNC invite whoever it wants only to let it weaken the conference. Take everything Fluguar says with a grain of salt.