alternative for you might be. Just because you have not read and/or refuse to acknowledge that opinion is out there is on you. You have been told before that people at various media outlets including CBS Sports, USA Today, Sports Business Journal and others have floated similar ideas in reports and you choose to ignore. Neither ESPN, FOX or the Big 12 would admit such but, facts and a little common sense would leave reasonably logical and intelligent people to arrive at that conclusion. The outsize value of OU and UT to Big 12 contracts has been previously acknowledged in multiple reports by multiple outlets. To expect four G5 schools and and 4 PAC 12 schools to offset their departure so the new contract is greater strains reality and begs the question of what changed?. Couple that with the previous threat by the Big 12 to sue ESPN if OU and UT walked early to the actual outcome that they left early and paid less than the full exit fee certainly raises the question of what concession the Big 12 received for dropping their opposition? These questions along with others surrounding concessions by and to FOX and a bonus to Colorado as the dam breaker are some of the other occurrences that support the assertion that the current Big 12 contract is about more than just its value as a media property. Feel free to answer the questions raised and show everyone what you know.