All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

B
Joined: 10/03/2022
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 4,007
Subscriber

There was an inability on a fundamental level to understand and-

acknowledge which way the winds were clearly blowing. In spite of all the available information to indicate football should be the sole focus, basketball interests remained the priority for the conference, which couldn't be more clear when you see the additions when the conference continued to expand. Without exception, the ACC added basketball-first schools that showed and continue to show very little interest in fielding nationally competitive football programs. In 2005, 2011, and 2012, you'd have thought it was 1979 when you saw who the ACC was adding to the conference. Nobody since at least 1979 has taken, or will ever again take Louisville, Pitt, Syracuse, or Boston College seriously when it comes to football. The ACC, for whatever reason, failed to recognize this clearly obvious element when it added those programs. The conference was thinking about basketball, and quality basketball opponents for Duke and UNC, and NCAAT units. But, probably the bigger problem is that the ACC allowed, and continues to allow, it's primary "business partner" to disseminate constantly at the loudest possible volume the narrative that the ACC is an inferior, JV product that should only be viewed as an alternative to its primary business competitor, the SEC. This is the most egregious error committed by the conference, and it continues to this day. The damage to the ACC's reputation and viability done by "It Just Means More" is, quite frankly, incalculable. It's a knife that continues to enter the ACC's back every single day. As it stands today, ACC teams can't even get on ABC anymore unless they're playing an SEC team. "Business partner," my ass. The ACC should have had some dignity and demanded that that line of BS get nixed, or it wasn't going to do business with ESPN. Now, they've been enshrined as "little brother" and the inferior product for 20 years, and in another five or so years, the enterprise is going to implode. All of this just goes to show what can happen when you have a culture of self-importance mixed with a stout combination of greed, incompetence, laziness, and cowardice running your enterprise. It's always just a matter of time before they run it right into the ground.
Posted: 08/12/2025 at 04:14 PM ET
(In response to this post by RJHokie)

Thread Replies (35)

Full Thread →
The VT BoV presentation link for those who are curious
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/10/25 06:53 PM ET
All of you are missing the “good news here”â€Ļ
Stech â€ĸ 08/12/25 10:59 PM ET
EXACTLY same with the southern and the ACC
1947Sunbowl â€ĸ 08/14/25 07:25 PM ET
Will anything come from this?
hokieball â€ĸ 08/12/25 02:13 PM ET
See Baltimore's post below
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/12/25 03:41 PM ET
Not so fast, in another briefing there is a proposal for more emphasis
1947Sunbowl â€ĸ 08/12/25 10:48 PM ET
Time to strike is now since more kids from up north are seeking southern
91HokieBob â€ĸ 08/13/25 01:23 PM ET
I'm sure the guy that ran Boeing will have lots of good ideas**
CrystalCoveHokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 10:16 PM ET
FY 2025 Estimated TV distribution by Conference
RandomAsianGuy â€ĸ 08/11/25 05:17 PM ET
The slide of the four scenarios needs some explanation.
Maroon Baboon â€ĸ 08/11/25 12:47 AM ET
Odd
SpeakToDamien â€ĸ 08/12/25 10:44 AM ET
OK your opinion
1947Sunbowl â€ĸ 08/11/25 09:56 AM ET
You must have never sat in on a board meeting.
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 09:47 AM ET
And
Vippie1 â€ĸ 08/12/25 05:51 PM ET
I've helped create materials for a fortune 50 board
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/11/25 01:44 PM ET
At least they're talking about it.**
Maroon Baboon â€ĸ 08/11/25 10:53 PM ET
IMO the issue....
2hhoop3 â€ĸ 08/12/25 08:11 AM ET
Hallelujah YES 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 At minimum Whit should have been doing
91HokieBob â€ĸ 08/12/25 05:39 PM ET
I would LOVE to see a version of this deck from 2005
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/12/25 02:58 PM ET
In 2005, the ACC was the richest college athletics conference in the USA.**
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 03:53 PM ET
What is the......
2hhoop3 â€ĸ 08/12/25 04:58 PM ET
Everything you mention.
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/13/25 10:30 AM ET
I have and I was trying to see exactly .....
2hhoop3 â€ĸ 08/13/25 12:40 PM ET
Truth.
RJHokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 03:58 PM ET
There was an inability on a fundamental level to understand and- ◄
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 04:14 PM ET
And think about this. During the Expanded ACC's formative years ...
Atlee Hokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 08:47 PM ET
They had a couple or three games against Clemson, but basically none-
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/13/25 10:27 AM ET
I am encouraged by how fired up everyone is.
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/12/25 04:42 PM ET
Happy to help!
91HokieBob â€ĸ 08/12/25 05:40 PM ET
As a public document they are likely withholding sensitive info
VT ChemE 1986 â€ĸ 08/11/25 04:01 PM ET
I don't think "they" meant for it to be public, at least not-
Baltimore_Hokie â€ĸ 08/12/25 03:57 PM ET
I agree with everything you just said.
VT ChemE 1986 â€ĸ 08/12/25 04:32 PM ET
How much would Nick Saban cost?
hokieball â€ĸ 08/12/25 05:28 PM ET
There are multiple tells in this deck based on the wording
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/11/25 07:54 AM ET
Here is a Reddit thread discussing it**
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/10/25 07:43 PM ET
This slide for 5 year avg viewership is telling me two things
HokieAl â€ĸ 08/10/25 11:07 PM ET