Apologize 4 not being clearer, you're misunderstanding some I'm saying.
I'll take them one at a time.
"You are talking about something that may or may not happen 11 years from now. ESPN will go to where they can make the most profit, and those rights will be bid on by other entities. ESPN is not in the business of building conferences in the NCAA. They are in the business of making money."
No one knows what is going to happen, not even me. :-) If I gave that impression, that is not the case, but I do think what I laid out is a plausible theory for the future. I don't believe this is 11 years out, the penalties to leave in 2031 will be less than what the P2 make in a year, I think those that get an invite will be playing in a P2 in 2031. I agree ESPN is in the business of making money through sports first. They will not be the NCAA, but they could take over the broadcasting of the expanded NCAA basketball tournament to make money. Dropping the MLB frees them up to be able to do that IMHO.
"If they wanted more basketball content, they could have out bid those that have the Big East rights. In addition, basketball is worth 25% AT BEST of football. Also, the SEC has the money to "build" their own basketball conference."
I don't think they want every Big East team. Just like the ACC didn't want every Big East team when they were acquiring them. Just like the SEC doesn't want every ACC team. They want the basketball schools that will make them the most money. The SEC is Southern mainly eastern Conference, but ESPN needs a national conference too. I think the ACC with their penalty money coming in and ESPN signed on until 2036 could easily be that conference for them. Lastly, I think the NCAA basketball tournament is going to expand to 80-90 some teams. That is going to be more money. I think they use the early rounds to keep paying for other sports, but I think the Sweet 16 and later rounds are going to produce more money similar to what they do with the football playoff. So I think the economics are going to change for the NCAA College Basketball.
"I'm also perplexed on how VT fans would even want to be in a basketball conference. You guys are a football school, through and through."
You are correct that Virginia Tech is first a football school, there is no denying that. Because of that most Techies first want to be in P2, it's pretty split between the B1G and the SEC. We get a lot of our students from up north and many of them want the B1G, but we also have closer access location wise to the SEC since most Techies live in Virginia. Now I think we will get into a P2, but let's say for some reason we didn't, I think that means that only about 2-3 schools went to the P2. If we aren't one of them, you could see a shift in priorities because each Conference at the top has one number one sport whether they admit it or not. Thus if the P2 didn't work out for us, and we could end up in an ACC with schools like Duke, Kansas, Arizona, UCONN etc. I could easily see our investments shift more to basketball knowing the top recruits in football go the SEC and B1G, but the recruits that want a Conference where basketball is first, could easily be the ACC.
** Edited by Stech at 3/5/2025, 1:32:25 PM
Thread Replies (20)
ESPN extended ACC agreement to 2036, wouldn’t do that to kill Conference.
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 02:37 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 02:37 PM ET
Have you ever stopped to consider that ESPN doesn't HAVE to continue-
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Mar 04, 2025 at 05:44 PM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
03/04/25 05:44 PM ET
Well, you are right, ESPN/big media does not have to renew anybody
-- VTCALS72
Mar 04, 2025 at 07:15 PM ET
VTCALS72
•
03/04/25 07:15 PM ET
I see ESPN trying to build up ACC 🏀 again, some BE schools & B12 schools
-- Stech
Mar 05, 2025 at 10:09 AM ET
Stech
•
03/05/25 10:09 AM ET
You are talking about something that may or may not happen
-- Big12 guy
Mar 05, 2025 at 10:51 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
03/05/25 10:51 AM ET
Apologize 4 not being clearer, you're misunderstanding some I'm saying.
◄
-- Stech
Mar 05, 2025 at 01:13 PM ET
Stech
•
03/05/25 01:13 PM ET
It’s 11 years away, it’s inconsequential right now. There are bigger 🐟 to
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 06:04 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 06:04 PM ET
My hope is to simply be here myself in 11 years!!**
-- VintonHokies
Mar 05, 2025 at 07:02 AM ET
VintonHokies
•
03/05/25 07:02 AM ET
You know they don't want to lose schools to Fox/B1X
-- EDGEMAN
Mar 04, 2025 at 04:21 PM ET
EDGEMAN
•
03/04/25 04:21 PM ET
SEC & B1G are meeting alone constantly, their cooperating to make more 💵
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 06:00 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 06:00 PM ET
Maybe we just keep adding $ to FSU and Clemson until they stay forever?
-- Truthahn
Mar 05, 2025 at 01:00 PM ET
Truthahn
•
03/05/25 01:00 PM ET
They are SOL if the lawsuit doesn’t go their way
-- Red Hokie
Mar 04, 2025 at 08:58 PM ET
Red Hokie
•
03/04/25 08:58 PM ET
You’re right. The ACC has such a long history of smart decisions **
-- Tailgate Guru
Mar 04, 2025 at 07:43 PM ET
Tailgate Guru
•
03/04/25 07:43 PM ET
They're making money on the current ACC arrangement, but guessing there is
-- VT757to276
Mar 04, 2025 at 02:57 PM ET
VT757to276
•
03/04/25 02:57 PM ET
ACC would’ve fought in court if they’re getting nothing, long term security
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 03:00 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 03:00 PM ET
There is really nothing,......
-- 2hhoop3
Mar 04, 2025 at 04:00 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
03/04/25 04:00 PM ET
You might be right, I may be giving Jim “Dame” Phillips too much credit.**
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 05:55 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 05:55 PM ET
I did not say or believe......
-- 2hhoop3
Mar 04, 2025 at 06:36 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
03/04/25 06:36 PM ET
Honestly I have plenty of doubt when you talk about Phillips & Babcock,
-- Stech
Mar 04, 2025 at 06:58 PM ET
Stech
•
03/04/25 06:58 PM ET