For A,
mostly "who cares," because it's a really unlikely and obscure scenario. And everyone is exposed to potential lawsuits these days, but the settlement doesn't say who has to get revenue sharing and in what proportion does it? Just that schools can share and that there's a cap.
For B, I thought we were talking about a D2/D3 violation, not UNC-C.
Thread Replies (11)
NCAA opting out of NIL enforcement
-- daveinop
May 20, 2025 at 04:10 PM ET
daveinop
•
05/20/25 04:10 PM ET
potentially good move for the NCAA
-- daveinop
May 21, 2025 at 07:26 AM ET
daveinop
•
05/21/25 07:26 AM ET
The schools will likely run into the same issues (i.e. antitrust, how to
-- VTHokie2000
May 21, 2025 at 11:38 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/21/25 11:38 AM ET
So, the proverbial P2 foxes watching the henhouse. That is laughable.
-- Maroon Unit
May 21, 2025 at 05:57 AM ET
Maroon Unit
•
05/21/25 05:57 AM ET
Unless the Commission is really a fox in sheep's clothing.**
-- VTHokie2000
May 21, 2025 at 12:02 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/21/25 12:02 PM ET
I can't wait to see how the power conferences plan to enforce the
-- VTHokie2000
May 20, 2025 at 05:03 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/20/25 05:03 PM ET
The settlement has 4 key points: back pay, revenue sharing, NIL agreements
-- VTHokie2000
May 20, 2025 at 07:39 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/20/25 07:39 PM ET
Absolutely, totally worthless organization!!**
-- ancient alien 2018
May 20, 2025 at 05:02 PM ET
ancient alien 2018
•
05/20/25 05:02 PM ET
They host championships
-- 1947Sunbowl
May 20, 2025 at 10:11 PM ET
1947Sunbowl
•
05/20/25 10:11 PM ET
Just how the schools (including VT?) want it.**
-- VTHokie2000
May 20, 2025 at 06:16 PM ET
VTHokie2000
•
05/20/25 06:16 PM ET