Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
S
Joined: 02/16/2001
Posts: 41,763
Likes: 24,052
Stech
Lifetime

Not sure, but it’s entirely possible being at the bottom of the P2 won’t be

what it is right now.
Posted: 03/09/2025 at 10:41 PM ET
(In response to this post by ancient alien 2018)

Thread Replies (35)

Full Thread →
I wonder if this ACC agreement goes the other way
The_VT_Rock • 03/09/25 01:15 PM ET
I am watching with interest, but not for the reasons some
Big12 guy • 03/09/25 06:36 PM ET
Uneven distribution according 2 multiple n media is going to P2 Conferences
Stech • 03/09/25 08:16 PM ET
Exactly. Just like the B12 was used to be a safe harbor for PAC teams
VTCALS72 • 03/10/25 10:35 AM ET
Yep seems we are going to more of an eat what you kill model for all. The
Stech • 03/10/25 11:39 AM ET
So for ultimate survival, should the ACC and B12
VTCALS72 • 03/10/25 12:16 PM ET
Interesting question, I wonder if they would get more 💵? Phillips retires
Stech • 03/10/25 01:18 PM ET
Uneven distribution in the P2 might be exactly what the ACC needs to keep
wwhokie1 • 03/09/25 09:05 PM ET
It certainly has saved it for the short term, the long run I’m not sure.**
Stech • 03/09/25 10:43 PM ET
Is there really a "long term" for anything below the P2 right now?**
VTCALS72 • 03/10/25 12:19 PM ET
🤷‍♂️**
Stech • 03/10/25 01:18 PM ET
Can you imagine UNC or Miami playing football in the SEC?
EDGEMAN • 03/10/25 07:05 AM ET
So if this does indeed happen in P2, VT's best bet financially would
ancient alien 2018 • 03/09/25 08:32 PM ET
Not sure, but it’s entirely possible being at the bottom of the P2 won’t be ◄
Stech • 03/09/25 10:41 PM ET
UVa and VT are also still tied together politically.
Maroon Baboon • 03/09/25 09:11 PM ET
I came to that conclusion too.
VTCALS72 • 03/10/25 12:18 PM ET
That's not true. It's never been true.
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 09:30 AM ET
You have an erroneous.....
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 12:01 PM ET
Also in 2003-4 UVA had nothing to lose by supporting VT. They were already
seekoHoG • 03/10/25 10:14 AM ET
I wasn't referring to the Big East days, I am referring to recent events.
Maroon Baboon • 03/10/25 09:54 AM ET
Nobody in Richmond forbade VT from going to the SEC in 2011.
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 10:37 AM ET
You're entitled......
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 11:02 AM ET
You're entitled to believe whatever it was you were told, if you think-
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 11:58 AM ET
Nothing was ever said....
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 12:04 PM ET
Oh, I understand perfectly. But you can just keep acting like you're-
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 12:14 PM ET
If you understood it....
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 12:27 PM ET
Ok, papaw.**
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 12:56 PM ET
Another......
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 12:59 PM ET
OK, why don't YOU support YOUR version of events?
Baltimore_Hokie • 03/10/25 03:18 PM ET
Never said anything about.......
2hhoop3 • 03/10/25 03:51 PM ET
I don’t blame the 1st time, but when Texas OU left & Finebaum’s guest said
Stech • 03/10/25 11:55 AM ET
I don't believe the SEC wants anything to do with UVA, makes zero sense
cvillehokie92 • 03/10/25 12:15 PM ET
SEC will not hold anything against if they truly desire.
MrFantastic! • 03/10/25 12:11 PM ET
I would hate to be the politician who kept either VT or UVA from accepting
wwhokie1 • 03/10/25 10:01 AM ET
I agree. And the comments from 2023 were even eye brow raising back then.
Maroon Baboon • 03/10/25 10:07 AM ET
I think the smaller schools were the ones pushing for more 🏀💵, that’s why
Stech • 03/09/25 03:20 PM ET