All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTHokie2000
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 41,416
Likes: 17,028

Something to consider when talking about proposals to college football

season moving its start date to Week 0 or an even earlier week is the impact it could have on player safety. Remember teams currently can't start their first day of practice until 3 or 4 weeks before their first game (I forget the exact bylaw that spells out that requirement). That means teams will start practice either at the end of July or beginning of August depending on the date of their first game. Given the average temperatures (think heat and humidity) around the country during that time of the year, there is a great likelihood that the bulk of the schools (including DI-FCS, DII, and DIII) will be forced to practice outside in that environment. What is the risk that schools will see an increase in the number of players experiencing either heat exhaustion or even a heat stroke because they were practicing in full pads in heat and humidity? Based on the various news stories on this issue over the years, I would think the greatest risk are to players in the 17-19 (maybe 20) range. This may be a risk schools aren't willing to take on even if it could mean more money for them.
Posted: 06/23/2025 at 09:48 AM ET
(In response to this post by Big12 guy)

Thread Replies (21)

Full Thread →
College football leaders revisit moving up season to Week Zero 🔗
Stech 06/21/25 09:13 PM ET
Rivalries need to be spread throughout the season. It would be better for
Maroon Baboon 06/22/25 01:03 PM ET
Are you tired of beating UVA in the last game to get to 6 wins?**
EDGEMAN 06/23/25 05:37 AM ET
Never tired of beating UVA to end the season...
gman86 06/23/25 01:34 PM ET
You can spread them out if you want to, but I prefer OOC rivalries to start
Stech 06/22/25 03:09 PM ET
Now that FBS players will be paid, and they are by
Big12 guy 06/22/25 08:19 AM ET
Something to consider when talking about proposals to college football
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 09:48 AM ET
Normally. I would 100% agree with you, but times have changed. The
Big12 guy 06/23/25 09:59 AM ET
Do the players have a say on when the season starts and/or end? If not,
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 11:21 AM ET
That is a different argument. You are now talking process. from
Big12 guy 06/23/25 11:33 AM ET
It may not be a black-n-white issue though. If Kansas wants to play Drake
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 11:39 AM ET
I'll be the first to admit that none of this is black and white. Drake, for
Big12 guy 06/23/25 12:38 PM ET
I don't disagree the revenue sharing is a game changer. Right now, we
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 12:56 PM ET
I believe you are now in the realm of a national anti trust
Big12 guy 06/23/25 01:29 PM ET
Given that the schools receive both federal and state funding, it would be
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 02:35 PM ET
Good points all. The line may be revenue sports, and the
Big12 guy 06/23/25 02:44 PM ET
There may not be a "clean" answer to this problem. The "answer" if there
VTHokie2000 06/23/25 02:58 PM ET
Yeah I would rather see the Champ game go away & emphasize regular season.
Stech 06/22/25 08:35 AM ET
Playoffs are here to stay. Just a very small % of the
Big12 guy 06/22/25 09:04 AM ET
Agreed playoffs r here 2 stay & I am glad, now schedule strong reg season.
Stech 06/22/25 10:20 AM ET
Win your conference, and your in. As long as that is in place, your OOC
Big12 guy 06/22/25 10:29 AM ET
Agree win your Conference you are in, but strong OOC games can increase
Stech 06/22/25 02:24 PM ET