All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Maroon Effect
Joined: 12/10/2006
Posts: 8,791
Likes: 10,474
Subscriber

Yes, but they might add value to the SEC by diluting

The Missouris and Vanderbilt of the world. And although the ACC contract is terrible for us, maybe ESPN wants those liabilities off its balance sheet.
Posted: 08/06/2023 at 03:46 PM ET
(In response to this post by RoswellGAHokie)

Thread Replies (18)

Full Thread →
Is it possible ESPNs play is to kill off the ACC knowing they can still
Maroon Effect 08/06/23 03:24 PM ET
No, the ACC and ACC Network makes money for them at a reduced cost **
JLM-Hokie 08/06/23 08:16 PM ET
The Question Becomes the Profitability of the ACN
WarHog38 08/06/23 09:43 PM ET
ACC is ESPN's #2 college property
PadrosWindup 08/06/23 05:39 PM ET
Lets do Some Math
WarHog38 08/06/23 06:59 PM ET
They’re going to kill off interest in college football**
adcenterhokie 08/06/23 04:56 PM ET
It seems highly suspicious that when the PAC
Big12 guy 08/06/23 04:14 PM ET
Unhappy New Members?
WarHog38 08/06/23 05:22 PM ET
being part of the hateful 8, it was shameful how the PAC
Big12 guy 08/06/23 05:44 PM ET
All Just a Business
WarHog38 08/06/23 04:13 PM ET
Even among the P3 that you mention, I still feel like there is some
Maroon Baboon 08/06/23 04:23 PM ET
As others mentioned, ESPN has the two brands on the cheap now so there’s
RoswellGAHokie 08/06/23 03:39 PM ET
True, but ACC aggregate $$ still much more than paying FSU + Clemson SEC
BAMRising 08/06/23 03:47 PM ET
Yes, but they might add value to the SEC by diluting
Maroon Effect 08/06/23 03:46 PM ET
Just a question as i don't have a dog in your hunt,
Big12 guy 08/06/23 04:17 PM ET
ACC was closing the gap until the updated B1G and SEC contracts
daveinop 08/06/23 05:22 PM ET
I remember when it was signed people thought it wasn't great but that it
tarheelblue 08/06/23 05:05 PM ET
It does as you say look worse........
2hhoop3 08/06/23 06:01 PM ET
sorry, didn't see your post**
daveinop 08/06/23 05:24 PM ET