Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
HokieAl
Joined: 10/07/1999
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 12,677
HokieAl
Founder

I'm trying to sell a dream Freddy. Look past the rundown fixer upper

and see the potential of renovating it into something new. The ultimate win for the ACC would be having secret negotiations with ESPN for an expanded ACC. And then sell the existing teams on this and keeping them in the fold. Oddly enough, one of the selling points would be an "easier" path to the playoffs compared to the SEC and BIG. Sure it is a pipe dream, but anything is possible, just like UCLA being in the same conference as Rutgers.
Posted: 07/08/2022 at 05:08 PM ET
(In response to this post by Freddyburg Hokie)

Thread Replies (23)

Full Thread →
If I'm ACC, I would shred the GOR and make a power move with B12
HokieAl • 07/08/22 01:41 PM ET
Tell me how VT is a better get than Baylor. **
cricket77 • 07/08/22 04:17 PM ET
BU 20k students, VT 37k
HokieAl • 07/08/22 04:48 PM ET
Not pushing Baylor, just picked them out of Tx. People in Tx. Would argue
cricket77 • 07/08/22 07:35 PM ET
If you "shred the GOR" (no idea how though), schools will leave....
Freddyburg Hokie • 07/08/22 04:02 PM ET
I'm trying to sell a dream Freddy. Look past the rundown fixer upper ◄
HokieAl • 07/08/22 05:08 PM ET
Should be able to keep GOR intact and add schools, although that may be
wwhokie1 • 07/08/22 03:55 PM ET
I would try my hardest to lawyer up and keep the ACC intact, math isnt hard
soflahokie • 07/08/22 02:10 PM ET
No thanks Al, BTW did you watch video with John Skipper former ESPN Prez?
Stech • 07/08/22 01:58 PM ET
That was well worth the listen.**
Stork • 07/08/22 03:23 PM ET
Rice? I thought the ACC should have looked at Houston. Rice is great
dallasvt • 07/08/22 03:04 PM ET
Yeah, Houston’s got way more upside than Rice.**
mancunian • 07/08/22 03:47 PM ET
I don't see ND to ACC ever happening
HokieAl • 07/08/22 02:11 PM ET
That will reduce revenue**
133743Hokie • 07/08/22 07:35 PM ET
Why? To earn less money per team? Not to mention increase expenses. Pass **
133743Hokie • 07/08/22 01:48 PM ET
The money is unknown, that is the point
HokieAl • 07/08/22 01:55 PM ET
BigXII and PAC12 had smaller contracts than the ACC. How do their leftovers
133743Hokie • 07/08/22 07:38 PM ET
There is no team on the list of Big12 teams you show that adds revenue
Vienna_Hokie • 07/08/22 03:33 PM ET
Markets are not as important as the past. Marketing and matchups are
HokieAl • 07/08/22 03:50 PM ET
It's still going to be driven by subscribers
HOO86 • 07/08/22 04:56 PM ET
The ACC deal was better than the ones the BigXII and PAC12 had with their
133743Hokie • 07/08/22 02:13 PM ET
If you tear up the GoR, the most valuable teams will leave for SEC and B1G
tarheelblue • 07/08/22 02:01 PM ET
The money is known. Big 10 and SEC are getting it. No one else is
vtka93 • 07/08/22 01:59 PM ET
Also, this gets you FL, GA, SC, NC, VA, PA, OH, KY, KS, TX, OK, IA, WV
HokieAl • 07/08/22 01:46 PM ET