Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Conference Realignment Board
◀ ▶
S
Joined: 01/05/2001
Posts: 930
Likes: 301
SpeakToDamien

The rule next year protects them

The ACC needs to fix their tiebreaker rule and even their standing rule. UVA didn't play Miami, Pitt, GT, Clemson or SMU. Lost to crappy NC State (but that didn't count). I'd rather the top 2 ranked teams play absent a head to head tiebreaker.
Posted: 12/10/2025 at 09:43 AM ET
(In response to this post by RandomAsianGuy)

Thread Replies (50)

Full Thread →
ND AD’s interviews
RandomAsianGuy • 12/09/25 09:37 PM ET
The rule next year protects them ◄
SpeakToDamien • 12/10/25 09:43 AM ET
The ACC tiebreaker rules are an asinine way to arbitrate a tie.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 10:04 AM ET
Yep. I think head-to-head and ranking. Nothing else should matter.**
reestuart • 12/10/25 02:15 PM ET
Well football is king (of the world) and American football wishes it was
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 12:19 PM ET
Yeah matching the two highest ranked programs in
mancunian • 12/10/25 11:26 AM ET
The problem with relying on the FBS Playoff Poll is it is highly likely to
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 12:47 PM ET
I mean, I get it, the CFP poll is dictated by whatever ESPN wants.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 02:39 PM ET
The SEC didn't have its 2 highest ranked teams playing in its CCG.
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 02:54 PM ET
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm talking about a TIE BREAKER.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 02:58 PM ET
I believe the ACC did use the BCS Poll at one time as apart of its
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 03:11 PM ET
This. If the B12 championship game was not played, or
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 03:24 PM ET
If BYU had won the game, then it would have been interesting to see how far
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 03:40 PM ET
The best explanation - TT just had BYU's number, both times they played.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 03:30 PM ET
100%**
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 03:35 PM ET
The reason you use the CFP ranking as the tie breaker is simple:
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 03:21 PM ET
Not if the G conferences get multiple bids and the P2s are ranked 1-6.
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 03:32 PM ET
We can 100% agree on the CFP's lack of credibility, and the clear as day-
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 03:35 PM ET
If the process is going to gain any credibility, then the first step is
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 03:47 PM ET
Agree. In fact, they should just stop farting around and do what everyone-
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 03:56 PM ET
Are you sure that is what ESPN want? I would think ESPN wants only the
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 04:05 PM ET
14 at large spots lets them get whoever they want in.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 04:23 PM ET
Maybe so, but how quickly will those people lose interest if Notre Dame
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 04:29 PM ET
Just for fun, let's imagine a 24 team CFP this year:
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 05:13 PM ET
ESPN may still prefer to only have P2s or at the very least as many SEC
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:18 PM ET
ESPN only owns the rights for a period of time. Baltimore's
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 05:35 PM ET
I don't disagree. I'm not sure will give up its grip that easily though**
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:37 PM ET
Half the SEC is in that field, lol. You can stop playing devils advocate-
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 05:21 PM ET
I am having fun here. I want the field to be 100% SEC with a certain
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:36 PM ET
I think you meant a G5 conference champ lose by 20 or 30 in first round.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 04:39 PM ET
No, I meant blue bloods and other P2 teams
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 04:51 PM ET
If a blue blood loses by 20 or 30 to anyone, I'm not sure what to say.
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 04:52 PM ET
You said people objected to Tulane and JMU making the field because they
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:03 PM ET
I guess? My point is that if you let the 10 conference champs in, and have-
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 05:15 PM ET
The number of at-large teams is immaterial to me because the only purpose
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:25 PM ET
it's not likely, but with money and the transfer portal, it
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 04:47 PM ET
You might have better luck getting Ohio State to play in the Rubber Bowl,
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:15 PM ET
They did, so Toledo had a home game
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 05:20 PM ET
It was, but it wasn't to a degree. I get that Toledo made more money in
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:30 PM ET
The only way Toledo will get OSU to play at the Glass
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 05:37 PM ET
I agree, but since Baltimore wants us to "have fun," that is my version of
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 05:39 PM ET
Game Day on a Tuesday!**
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 05:41 PM ET
MACxactly**
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 06:35 PM ET
It's a no brainer from where I'm sitting. I'm in. **
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 04:04 PM ET
it's always been that way. The blue bloods will always get theirs. **
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 12:59 PM ET
I have a Pete Bavacqua on line one sir, he would like to discuss this post.**
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 02:40 PM ET
I don't disagree, but my point is that conferences historically have
VTHokie2000 • 12/10/25 01:42 PM ET
My bet is that the ACC will change the tie breaking rules. **
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 02:03 PM ET
They 100% will. Before Pete B. said, "hold my beer,"
Baltimore_Hokie • 12/10/25 02:42 PM ET
Because of the tie breaking rules, I read that if ND
Big12 guy • 12/10/25 09:54 AM ET
Let them play 8 games first. **
RandomAsianGuy • 12/10/25 01:22 PM ET