All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

hokieZ71
Joined: 01/03/2007
Posts: 18,413
Likes: 9,738

Specifics likely vague so ACC can funnel $ to who they want to keep happy

Example: Many have discussed how there’s no easy way to quantify ACC Network ratings. In this situation, the league can create their own quantitative analysis for ACC Network ratings in order to arrive at the exact money distribution they desire. In a very rudimentary example, think of it like this equation. (Clemson’s major network ratings + X) ^y = Clemson’s payout. X is the ACC network rating for Clemson. Which the ACC doesn’t care about. It only cares what it’s paying Clemson. y is the quantitative multiplier that the ACC can use to turn ratings into dollars (it won’t be this simple, but this is a simple explananation) So let’s say that equation now looks like this: (Clemson’s major network ratings + X) ^y = $60M Oh….now the ACC knows it wants to get to $60M for Clemson. And it can use its major TV ratings as a way to quantify that without the need for ACC Network ratings. Because it can set y at whatever it needs to get to $60M. And here’s the great thing about numbers and finances. The quantitative variable y will be different for all 17.33 ACC schools! Because they are all different, some are big in hoops bringing in more NCAA units, reside in major TV markets that create higher carriage fees for the ACCN, have fans that travel to bowl games bringing in added bowl revenue for the league, and on and on and on. So basically, the ACC already knows what it needs to pay Clemson, UNC, Miami and FSU to keep them happy. It knows it can take money away from BC, Syracuse, Wake, Duke, SMU, Stanford, Cal and Pitt in order to do this. Because those schools have to know that taking a few million less a year in the ACC as it currently exists is better than any other option they have. And the ACC knows it can keep payouts very similar for UVA, VT, NC State, GT and Louisville and they will be happy because they have more options than the smaller private schools but they aren’t locks to move to the P2. And the ACC can do all of that by setting X and y however it chooses for all of them. So if Clemson and FSU get $15M more per year and Miami and UNC get $5M more per year, and you take $5M per year away from 8 small and/or private schools in the ACC, bada bing! ** Edited by hokieZ71 at 8/4/2025, 10:27:09 AM
Posted: 08/04/2025 at 10:25 AM ET
(In response to this post by HokieAl)

Thread Replies (28)

Full Thread →
Bad news, ACC revenue sharing will not be kind to VT
HokieAl 08/04/25 12:15 AM ET
How much $$ will a 3-9 record get? Asking for a friend.**
HokieNoVA 08/04/25 04:53 PM ET
"bout tree fiddy"**
ancient alien 2018 08/05/25 09:26 PM ET
So per team, what are we looking at per year?
HouClone 08/04/25 04:34 PM ET
So are you an Iowa State fan?
hokieZ71 08/10/25 09:14 AM ET
CyTown should be very good
HouClone 08/11/25 05:58 PM ET
That’s a good question
HokieAl 08/04/25 09:01 PM ET
“6-6 Records will get after you now” 🤣, or “win baby win baby win!” 🏈👊
Stech 08/04/25 03:31 PM ET
This data is not believable.
gman86 08/04/25 01:21 PM ET
Here is the proof. The sad fact is that VT has actually fallen that far
HokieAl 08/04/25 11:23 PM ET
This data is 100% accurate for known viewership numbers
HokieAl 08/04/25 02:19 PM ET
"All the ACC schools play on the ACCN and so all schools equally have
GusDaMan 08/08/25 12:21 PM ET
Agreed that the impact is likely not equal
HokieAl 08/08/25 02:20 PM ET
That is the main problem,.......
2hhoop3 08/04/25 02:37 PM ET
Agreed. And I can actually normalize all of that
HokieAl 08/04/25 03:41 PM ET
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy by design. Of course the conference wants
NokieHokie 08/04/25 03:17 PM ET
The ACC traded.......
2hhoop3 08/04/25 03:31 PM ET
Good synopsis.**
saret 08/04/25 03:41 PM ET
Specifics likely vague so ACC can funnel $ to who they want to keep happy
hokieZ71 08/04/25 10:25 AM ET
Just another reason I've predicted that the ACC is dead in the water.
Baltimore_Hokie 08/04/25 10:03 AM ET
I don't understand why schools voted for the brand initiative.
Flanker 08/04/25 12:28 PM ET
The current ACC will exist as long as the P2 decides NOT to expand.
manassashoo 08/04/25 10:37 AM ET
I concur. **
Big12 guy 08/04/25 11:57 AM ET
Well that means vt needs to raise more
1947Sunbowl 08/04/25 08:26 AM ET
It’s the other way around. Donations are the extra money
HokieAl 08/04/25 09:52 AM ET
Not accurate....
2hhoop3 08/04/25 01:32 PM ET
I think we have drifted a bit in this thread
HokieAl 08/04/25 02:28 PM ET
Yeah, I find it very telling there is no info/metrics re:
saret 08/04/25 01:36 PM ET
Where did the money come from before conferences
Big12 guy 08/04/25 10:07 AM ET