Joined:
01/03/2007
Posts:
18,413
Likes:
9,738
Specifics likely vague so ACC can funnel $ to who they want to keep happy
Example: Many have discussed how there’s no easy way to quantify ACC Network ratings. In this situation, the league can create their own quantitative analysis for ACC Network ratings in order to arrive at the exact money distribution they desire.
In a very rudimentary example, think of it like this equation.
(Clemson’s major network ratings + X) ^y = Clemson’s payout.
X is the ACC network rating for Clemson. Which the ACC doesn’t care about. It only cares what it’s paying Clemson.
y is the quantitative multiplier that the ACC can use to turn ratings into dollars (it won’t be this simple, but this is a simple explananation)
So let’s say that equation now looks like this:
(Clemson’s major network ratings + X) ^y = $60M
Oh….now the ACC knows it wants to get to $60M for Clemson. And it can use its major TV ratings as a way to quantify that without the need for ACC Network ratings. Because it can set y at whatever it needs to get to $60M.
And here’s the great thing about numbers and finances. The quantitative variable y will be different for all 17.33 ACC schools! Because they are all different, some are big in hoops bringing in more NCAA units, reside in major TV markets that create higher carriage fees for the ACCN, have fans that travel to bowl games bringing in added bowl revenue for the league, and on and on and on.
So basically, the ACC already knows what it needs to pay Clemson, UNC, Miami and FSU to keep them happy. It knows it can take money away from BC, Syracuse, Wake, Duke, SMU, Stanford, Cal and Pitt in order to do this. Because those schools have to know that taking a few million less a year in the ACC as it currently exists is better than any other option they have. And the ACC knows it can keep payouts very similar for UVA, VT, NC State, GT and Louisville and they will be happy because they have more options than the smaller private schools but they aren’t locks to move to the P2.
And the ACC can do all of that by setting X and y however it chooses for all of them. So if Clemson and FSU get $15M more per year and Miami and UNC get $5M more per year, and you take $5M per year away from 8 small and/or private schools in the ACC, bada bing!
** Edited by hokieZ71 at 8/4/2025, 10:27:09 AM
Thread Replies (28)
Bad news, ACC revenue sharing will not be kind to VT
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 12:15 AM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 12:15 AM ET
How much $$ will a 3-9 record get? Asking for a friend.**
-- HokieNoVA
Aug 04, 2025 at 04:53 PM ET
HokieNoVA
•
08/04/25 04:53 PM ET
"bout tree fiddy"**
-- ancient alien 2018
Aug 05, 2025 at 09:26 PM ET
ancient alien 2018
•
08/05/25 09:26 PM ET
So per team, what are we looking at per year?
-- HouClone
Aug 04, 2025 at 04:34 PM ET
HouClone
•
08/04/25 04:34 PM ET
So are you an Iowa State fan?
-- hokieZ71
Aug 10, 2025 at 09:14 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
08/10/25 09:14 AM ET
“6-6 Records will get after you now” 🤣, or “win baby win baby win!” 🏈👊
-- Stech
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:31 PM ET
Stech
•
08/04/25 03:31 PM ET
Here is the proof. The sad fact is that VT has actually fallen that far
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 11:23 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 11:23 PM ET
This data is 100% accurate for known viewership numbers
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:19 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 02:19 PM ET
"All the ACC schools play on the ACCN and so all schools equally have
-- GusDaMan
Aug 08, 2025 at 12:21 PM ET
GusDaMan
•
08/08/25 12:21 PM ET
Agreed that the impact is likely not equal
-- HokieAl
Aug 08, 2025 at 02:20 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/08/25 02:20 PM ET
That is the main problem,.......
-- 2hhoop3
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:37 PM ET
2hhoop3
•
08/04/25 02:37 PM ET
Agreed. And I can actually normalize all of that
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:41 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 03:41 PM ET
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy by design. Of course the conference wants
-- NokieHokie
Aug 04, 2025 at 03:17 PM ET
NokieHokie
•
08/04/25 03:17 PM ET
Specifics likely vague so ACC can funnel $ to who they want to keep happy
◄
-- hokieZ71
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:25 AM ET
hokieZ71
•
08/04/25 10:25 AM ET
Just another reason I've predicted that the ACC is dead in the water.
-- Baltimore_Hokie
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:03 AM ET
Baltimore_Hokie
•
08/04/25 10:03 AM ET
I don't understand why schools voted for the brand initiative.
-- Flanker
Aug 04, 2025 at 12:28 PM ET
Flanker
•
08/04/25 12:28 PM ET
The current ACC will exist as long as the P2 decides NOT to expand.
-- manassashoo
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:37 AM ET
manassashoo
•
08/04/25 10:37 AM ET
Well that means vt needs to raise more
-- 1947Sunbowl
Aug 04, 2025 at 08:26 AM ET
1947Sunbowl
•
08/04/25 08:26 AM ET
It’s the other way around. Donations are the extra money
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 09:52 AM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 09:52 AM ET
I think we have drifted a bit in this thread
-- HokieAl
Aug 04, 2025 at 02:28 PM ET
HokieAl
•
08/04/25 02:28 PM ET
Yeah, I find it very telling there is no info/metrics re:
-- saret
Aug 04, 2025 at 01:36 PM ET
saret
•
08/04/25 01:36 PM ET
Where did the money come from before conferences
-- Big12 guy
Aug 04, 2025 at 10:07 AM ET
Big12 guy
•
08/04/25 10:07 AM ET