All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

VTHokie2000
Joined: 01/01/2005
Posts: 41,416
Likes: 17,028

Historically, the courts have said that not all monopolies are bad.

In some cases, monopolies can even be a good thing because it can keep cost low (or lower) for consumers. On the surface, this may not be one of those cases. However, if the media companies are really pulling the strings behind the scene for the various organizations (i.e. NCAA, College Football Playoff, LLC, etc.) involved here, then it is possible consumers could be indirectly involved when you start to look at how a college athletic monopoly impacts consumer subscription costs regardless whether you are talking cable, satellite, or streaming service.
Posted: 06/08/2024 at 10:41 AM ET
(In response to this post by VTinSC)

Thread Replies (8)

Full Thread →
Just curious. Is there anything monopolistic about this P2 arrangement?
VTinSC 06/07/24 01:52 PM ET
Same things that were monopolistic about the P4. Except for who's on the
wwhokie1 06/08/24 09:14 PM ET
Historically, the courts have said that not all monopolies are bad.
VTHokie2000 06/08/24 10:41 AM ET
Good question. But the answer is complicated. In terms of "the little guys"
Maroon Baboon 06/07/24 03:08 PM ET
For starters it would be a duopoly :)**
jesuisvtguy 06/07/24 02:30 PM ET
But is it really? The NFL is comprised of the AFC and NFC…
lawhokie 06/07/24 04:14 PM ET
Discovery might be interesting**
VTinSC 06/08/24 07:25 AM ET
But should the lawsuit be against the P2 conferences, or the corporations..
EDGEMAN 06/08/24 06:54 AM ET
Whoever has the most money
mrcaniac 06/09/24 12:35 AM ET