Joined:
01/01/2005
Posts:
41,416
Likes:
17,028
Historically, the courts have said that not all monopolies are bad.
In some cases, monopolies can even be a good thing because it can keep cost low (or lower) for consumers. On the surface, this may not be one of those cases. However, if the media companies are really pulling the strings behind the scene for the various organizations (i.e. NCAA, College Football Playoff, LLC, etc.) involved here, then it is possible consumers could be indirectly involved when you start to look at how a college athletic monopoly impacts consumer subscription costs regardless whether you are talking cable, satellite, or streaming service.
Thread Replies (8)
Just curious. Is there anything monopolistic about this P2 arrangement?
-- VTinSC
Jun 07, 2024 at 01:52 PM ET
VTinSC
•
06/07/24 01:52 PM ET
Same things that were monopolistic about the P4. Except for who's on the
-- wwhokie1
Jun 08, 2024 at 09:14 PM ET
wwhokie1
•
06/08/24 09:14 PM ET
Historically, the courts have said that not all monopolies are bad.
◄
-- VTHokie2000
Jun 08, 2024 at 10:41 AM ET
VTHokie2000
•
06/08/24 10:41 AM ET
Good question. But the answer is complicated. In terms of "the little guys"
-- Maroon Baboon
Jun 07, 2024 at 03:08 PM ET
Maroon Baboon
•
06/07/24 03:08 PM ET
For starters it would be a duopoly :)**
-- jesuisvtguy
Jun 07, 2024 at 02:30 PM ET
jesuisvtguy
•
06/07/24 02:30 PM ET
But is it really? The NFL is comprised of the AFC and NFC…
-- lawhokie
Jun 07, 2024 at 04:14 PM ET
lawhokie
•
06/07/24 04:14 PM ET
Discovery might be interesting**
-- VTinSC
Jun 08, 2024 at 07:25 AM ET
VTinSC
•
06/08/24 07:25 AM ET
But should the lawsuit be against the P2 conferences, or the corporations..
-- EDGEMAN
Jun 08, 2024 at 06:54 AM ET
EDGEMAN
•
06/08/24 06:54 AM ET