Most interesting part for me is that it seems like he does work 4 Clemson.

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Post #1084232 ◀ PREV NEXT ▶

Joined: 02/16/2001

Posts: 41,763

Likes: 24,052

Stech

It’s clearly an ACC biased point of view, but if he does work for Clemson, it could indicate where a very quiet Clemson stands.

Posted: 02/27/2024 at 03:40 PM ET

(In response to this post by patit hoo)

FSU's case against the ACC is weak to a non-starter. Article linked -- patit hoo Feb 27, 2024 at 02:30 PM ET

patit hoo • 02/27/24 02:30 PM ET

A few questions from me as I read that -- HokieAl Feb 27, 2024 at 05:19 PM ET

HokieAl • 02/27/24 05:19 PM ET

2nd paragraph -- VTCALS72 Feb 27, 2024 at 08:27 PM ET

VTCALS72 • 02/27/24 08:27 PM ET

Agree. The GOR was needed for ACCN -- HokieAl Feb 28, 2024 at 10:24 AM ET

HokieAl • 02/28/24 10:24 AM ET

First I have heard of statute of limitations. This seems pretty straight -- HboroughHokie Feb 27, 2024 at 05:10 PM ET

HboroughHokie • 02/27/24 05:10 PM ET

Most interesting part for me is that it seems like he does work 4 Clemson. ◄ -- Stech Feb 27, 2024 at 03:40 PM ET

Stech • 02/27/24 03:40 PM ET

As opposed to all the stuff from an anti ACC point of view** -- VTCALS72 Feb 28, 2024 at 10:57 AM ET

VTCALS72 • 02/28/24 10:57 AM ET

insightful read...2 interesting points -- VT757to276 Feb 27, 2024 at 03:02 PM ET

VT757to276 • 02/27/24 03:02 PM ET

Thanks for the link........ -- 2hhoop3 Feb 27, 2024 at 02:48 PM ET

2hhoop3 • 02/27/24 02:48 PM ET