All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Baltimore Hokie Baltimore Hokie OP
Jun 11, 2026 at 02:30 PM ET
Our county just passed 'No Data Centers' legislation - first in the state
I'm wondering if the state can trump this with their own legislation.

11 Replies

Brown Water Brown Water
1mo
Seems like there's a new one going up every day here in the Haymarket and
Gainesville area.
GSOHokie01 GSOHokie01
1mo
They are an evil no one wants in their backyard and opposition is fierce.
They are planning one southwest of Raleigh and the locals are strongly against it. Can’t blame them one bit. Unfortunately they have built all this AI nonsense into everything now and the monster needs to be fed.
UTPr0sim UTPr0sim
1mo
A smarter idea is to regulate them to meet your needs. They are going to
built somewhere. Protect your water, make them pay the upgrade price for Electricity, but don't ban them.
ColoVT82 ColoVT82
1mo
Manage it, yes. Throwing away $ and infrastructure
Baltimore Hokie Baltimore Hokie OP
1mo
The opposition is fierce
I think the state will try to get ahead of things, rather than have a patchwork of laws across the state.
MP4VT2004 MP4VT2004
1mo
Localities will always have the final say in approving development.
The state may try to prevent an outright ban, but ultimately, local authorities will have the final say on approving data center projects in their town/city/county.
tallahasseehokie tallahasseehokie
1mo
Nope Congress prohibited local interference with the rollout of the 5G
Infrastructure. BIG CELL can place a transmitter in your street right of way 50 feet from your bedroom and u have zero recourse.
RTFC RTFC
1mo
placing a transmitter on an existing structure or
erecting a tower on a very small parcel is different than a large footprint structure (although I get the precedent idea) They won't "ban" data centers - they will "require" buildings, any building, over a certain footprint - or over a certain utility requirement - to have, say...stricter water run off regulations, provide their own utilities - or pay for infrastructure - roads, etc. around it - making them less cost effective in their area. Localities walk a fine line giving tax breaks for a tax base and keeping residents happy with "planning"
MP4VT2004 MP4VT2004
1mo
But that differs from a data center, correct?
I hear you on the precedent that set, but I'm not aware of any legislation saying that no locality can deny a data center. But, I've certainly been wrong before...
tallahasseehokie tallahasseehokie
1mo
YouTube is loaded with investigative reporting on the graft behind big data
Monstrous sized data centers. What happens most of the time, city and/or county officials are made promises that the developers never intend to keep. Land is assembled by front men a most have no idea which of the megacorps will own and operate. Local politicians and planners are so hungry for growth they accept job creation and incremental tax base contribution estimates with no outside consultancy and little to no public disclosure. Small towns especially in poor areas simply railroad the projects through and ignore citizen input. A vast number of these mega enters are grouped in desert areas which are already under great stress regarding fresh water rationing. Several incidents of center owners sinking massive wells into the aquifer pulling millions of gallons of clean water monthly with no oversight or approval. We are living in the Wild West concerning the great data center rush. Americans are waking up thanks to alternative news coverage but it’s too late for Northern Virginia, Colorado River Basin, West Memphis, the new town of Columbus Ohio and on and on.
MP4VT2004 MP4VT2004
1mo
I don't disagree at all.
In fact, my parents are likely to be affected by a new data center development that Goochland plans to allow, which is going to directly affect me someday if I happen to outlive them and get tasked with selling their home. But that still does not refute my point that local authorities have the "final say". That may not mean that said local authoritues will act in the best interest of their constituents, but it also doesn't mean that the state government can overtly force localities to allow data centers to be approved...at least, not yet. I wouldn't put anything past the current administration... Electing representatives who will stand on principle rather than on policies that will lead to their own enrichment has never been more important, IMO...