Wow... I know you hate the refs to be a factor in the end of a ball game,
but Cleveland got away with mugging the Steelers' receiver there. Should've been DPI and first and goal with a few ticks left. Not saying Pittsburgh would've won it, but it shouldn't have ended there. Not on that blatant a foul.
6 Replies
7mo
but I thought the ref'ing was particularly one-sided. The two on the offensive line at key points were ridiculous.
(In response to this post by Hokie CPA)
7mo
I did not get the impression the WR got mugged or anything...I'll watch again at half time of the afternoon game and redlnded and official Joester verdict.
(In response to this post by Hokie CPA)
7mo
I don't see pass interference. They've only showed the one angle on the highlight shows so it's possible I'm missing something. Looks like good coverage on the angle they showed.
(In response to this post by JoesterVT)
7mo
Coming at ya, so to speak. Defender's arm was all in there before the ball ever got close. Defender never looked for the ball and never touched the ball. Catch wasn't made because defender kept receiver from making the play, while taking his wallet.
** Edited by Hokie CPA at 12/28/2025, 6:57:40 PM
(In response to this post by JoesterVT)
7mo
But "defender's arm was all in there" and "never looked for the ball" are not a part of the current rule.
(In response to this post by Hokie CPA)
7mo
That was interference. Trust me.
(In response to this post by JoesterVT)