Incoming transfers vs outgoing transfers per Andy Bitter on X
Incredible contrast mediated by 247 transfer rankings. An easy criticism would be that many outgoing transfers aren’t rated. Yes. But that seems a little superficial. Lots of players without a destination on the right.
Sekrah says the team on the left (transfers in) would beat the team on the right by 4-5 tuddies.
** Edited by V333T at 1/15/2026, 6:44:29 AM
6 Replies
6mo
they do either. One thing is for sure they don't like guys from Louisiana. Davis and Jackson ranked behind most of our exiting players is a joke. They obviously devalue G5 production over P4 minimal production.
(In response to this post by V333T)
I don't know either, but give me some 5 years over 5 stars, a.k.a. Indiana
& Isiah Thomas
(In response to this post by Jwunderdog)
6mo
biased against VT observing that when a recruit commits to VT he is immediately downgraded. Predictably, Brian Dohn pushes back but there seems to be a correlation IMO. I’m sure its not a VT bias, but a larger bias towards any of the ‘have nots’ (e.g. P2); 'if the P2 didn’t get them, they couldn’t be that good.'
(In response to this post by Jwunderdog)
6mo
(In response to this post by V333T)
6mo
(In response to this post by V333T)
6mo
maybe to high who know? I just take the rankings with a HUGE grain of salt.
(In response to this post by V333T)