Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Football Board
◀ ▶
V
Joined: 11/07/2020
Posts: 18,078
Likes: 13,320
VTCALS72
Subscriber

Do you know how are "targets" determined?

is it incompletions? Or is it like calling errors vs hits in baseball, you know subjective? How are things like OL breakdowns when a rusher is in the QBs sight line to the read #1 receiver right off the snap?
Posted: 04/25/2025 at 06:40 AM ET
(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)

Thread Replies (39)

Full Thread →
Which VT Player would you bet is taken first in this weekend's NFL Draft?
Painterboy • 04/23/25 03:44 PM ET
Tuten for sure. **
Zanderhokie • 04/24/25 10:27 PM ET
Peebles will go first for VT**
st_andrew • 04/24/25 04:48 PM ET
J-Lane (gettin Eddie Royal vibes) --> Tuten --> Peeples --> Strong
VTizzle • 04/24/25 12:43 PM ET
It depresses me to see and think of the large number of drafable
1977hokie • 04/24/25 11:14 AM ET
Coaching matters. It's not simply talent acquisition.**
NokieHokie • 04/24/25 01:22 PM ET
I’m thinking Tuten, followed by Lane, followed by APR. **
BEST2VT • 04/24/25 09:38 AM ET
Aren't APR and Peebles going to be in this draft?
ChrisLords • 04/24/25 12:39 AM ET
Tuten goes first; maybe 2nd round, most likely 3rd. APR and some others go
Hokie`79 • 04/24/25 08:03 AM ET
Dorian Strong
kingofcassell • 04/23/25 07:46 PM ET
I would be surprised if anyone other than Tuten is selected **
XundaVT • 04/23/25 04:51 PM ET
You haven't been paying attention.**
BG Hokie • 04/24/25 09:41 AM ET
I'd be quite surprised if no one other than Tuten is selected.**
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 09:11 AM ET
Agree. Seems we had several very good players last year,
BEST2VT • 04/24/25 10:15 AM ET
Lane will be picked IMO**
GCHokieof91 • 04/23/25 06:17 PM ET
Which is crazy (not because he isn't worthy) but because
VAHokie89 • 04/23/25 06:47 PM ET
"The unimaginative Hokie offense did not create many opportunities for deep
KCHokie2 • 04/24/25 07:17 PM ET
If you don't have long drives, you don't have as many opportunities
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 09:19 AM ET
We threw 37 times against Syracuse...
VAHokie89 • 04/24/25 11:20 AM ET
Umm, VT only threw the ball 24 times @ Syr last year. And ran it 48, so...
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 04:22 PM ET
We threw it 24 times against Syracuse and 37 against Clemson.
Chris ColemanAdmin • 04/24/25 12:01 PM ET
Do you know how are "targets" determined? ◄
VTCALS72 • 04/25/25 06:40 AM ET
The question is, was he open or covered…
ombandit • 04/25/25 04:25 AM ET
I'm saying he was under-utilized.
Chris ColemanAdmin • 04/25/25 04:33 AM ET
Or maybe Lane was the focus of D's?
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 04:27 PM ET
Exactly**
ombandit • 04/25/25 04:26 AM ET
Yes, but ultimately he only averaged 38.8 yards per game.
Chris ColemanAdmin • 04/24/25 04:30 PM ET
He caught 19% of VT receptions. That's not much less than other top ACC WRs
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 04:58 PM ET
I agree that didn't maximize the skills of the receivers, for sure.
Chris ColemanAdmin • 04/24/25 05:14 PM ET
It's not as though Lane is a 1st rounder. He's got skills, but flaws too.
marcbvtgm • 04/25/25 11:44 AM ET
Thanks for reversing/correcting my numbers :)
VAHokie89 • 04/24/25 12:33 PM ET
I’ve always said he was our best offensive player.
GCHokieof91 • 04/23/25 07:21 PM ET
So you would have used Tuten less and Lane more?
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 09:13 AM ET
Different position. Not on the same scale.
GCHokieof91 • 04/24/25 09:16 AM ET
It's a zero sum game unless you make the pie bigger. How would you do that?**
marcbvtgm • 04/24/25 09:26 AM ET
IDK for sure. Maybe increase the size of
GCHokieof91 • 04/24/25 03:23 PM ET
So become even more predictable?**
marcbvtgm • 04/25/25 11:42 AM ET
+1,000 on underuse
EDGEMAN • 04/23/25 07:57 PM ET
Probably reasons to be glad T-Bow isn’t here anymore. **
RJHokie • 04/23/25 07:10 PM ET
Tuten**
HokieBrazil • 04/23/25 04:48 PM ET