Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Football Board
◀ ▶
GreenvilleVT
Joined: 08/31/2007
Posts: 18,693
Likes: 23,606
GreenvilleVT

Totally disagree. There is very little pressure on the school to cut him

loose, very little appetite to pay a buyout and he’s spent a lot of time with donors and their spouses in recent years. Their athletic program (outside of women’s hoops) has been a clown show for over a decade. He might not be having a great year but they aren’t even close to letting him Given the injuries this year there is much more clamor to fire the S&C coach and Shula first. Beamers recruiting in the state of South Carolina has been unbelievable, they are not going to take the risk of firing him and letting this young class talent walk out the door.
Posted: 10/21/2025 at 11:25 AM ET
(In response to this post by Big D)

Thread Replies (28)

Full Thread →
why???
bourbonstreet • 10/20/25 09:07 PM ET
We need a grown up. Not a child. Shane appears so childish and at least
Hokebury • 10/21/25 03:14 PM ET
No Shane/ No Franklin / Make Mullen and offer he shouldn't refuse give him
vtox1 • 10/21/25 09:14 PM ET
...maybe we need(s) some of that uppity runs hot emotion... we=flatliners.**
bourbonstreet • 10/21/25 04:40 PM ET
USC is disorganized and undisciplined, PSU is not...
BROman Hokie • 10/21/25 01:44 PM ET
Shane would be an upgrade from the prior staff. BUT (and I'm talking a
VTHokie2000 • 10/21/25 11:20 AM ET
Shane made a statement to press yesterday and team
Virginian42 • 10/21/25 08:52 AM ET
...lol... yah; we've seen other famous "last words"... to be sure. +1.**
bourbonstreet • 10/21/25 04:41 PM ET
Very little chance he gets fired.
GreenvilleVT • 10/21/25 09:05 AM ET
Very little chance he doesn't get fired. **
Big D • 10/21/25 10:23 AM ET
Totally disagree. There is very little pressure on the school to cut him ◄
GreenvilleVT • 10/21/25 11:25 AM ET
Sounds like good intel
Virginian42 • 10/21/25 09:40 AM ET
Nothing against Shane, but too much money and false expectation; hire...
133182Hokie • 10/21/25 08:12 AM ET
Shane would definitely be an upgrade over Pry, but...
EDGEMAN • 10/21/25 06:14 AM ET
little article this morning.. very Interesting
JRHokie • 10/21/25 06:05 AM ET
More media mush
tallahasseehokie • 10/21/25 10:14 AM ET
Two names that I've heard..carry on
JRHokie • 10/21/25 01:49 AM ET
Shane would be a no brainer
SpeakToDamien • 10/20/25 11:27 PM ET
Nobody would know who he was if it wasn't for his last name. I don't
Tombo • 10/20/25 11:13 PM ET
Not looking for just an upgrade, looking for top level as proposed by
OlderHokie • 10/20/25 10:31 PM ET
No Shane would not be an upgrade
HokieAl • 10/20/25 10:22 PM ET
His numbers are similar to his fired predecessor - Muschamp.
BamBam • 10/21/25 08:23 AM ET
Thanks for laying it out on the table!
RiverVT • 10/20/25 10:37 PM ET
This year Shame has one more vistory than VT
RiverVT • 10/20/25 09:50 PM ET
Why not two head coaches? Franklin and Beamer. VT could be a first....
hokienole • 10/20/25 09:35 PM ET
Pry and Foster as co-DCs with Fuente as QB coach/OC, Stiney coaching OL**
Happy Dog • 10/21/25 06:19 AM ET
SC will be done with SB. Better them than us 5 years from now.**
40ozDistrict • 10/20/25 09:26 PM ET
VT hiring Shane would be very VT and show they've learned nothing
hokeyhokie • 10/20/25 09:13 PM ET
Yeah the article suggesting VT could be Beamer's "safety valve" is telling.**
MP4VT2004 • 10/20/25 10:19 PM ET