And what about funding returning players?

Football Board

Post #2010880 ◀ PREV NEXT ▶

Joined: 08/25/2005

Posts: 26,250

Likes: 17,299

Pylons

Posted: 12/04/2025 at 06:23 PM ET

(In response to this post by V333T)

All else the same, would you rather fill 22 positions with nil or 55? -- V333T Dec 04, 2025 at 05:50 PM ET

V333T • 12/04/25 05:50 PM ET

Is this a mandatory assignment or extra credit?** -- HoustonHokie Dec 04, 2025 at 08:48 PM ET

HoustonHokie • 12/04/25 08:48 PM ET

This would be a good SAT question. ** -- VTexas Dec 04, 2025 at 09:02 PM ET

VTexas • 12/04/25 09:02 PM ET

We have so called experts on player personnel decisions -- 1947Sunbowl Dec 04, 2025 at 06:38 PM ET

1947Sunbowl • 12/04/25 06:38 PM ET

CFB’s version of moneyball -- Marooned Dec 04, 2025 at 08:18 PM ET

Marooned • 12/04/25 08:18 PM ET

So the subject question isn't actually the question -- Pylons Dec 04, 2025 at 06:07 PM ET

Pylons • 12/04/25 06:07 PM ET

Yeah, the NIL per player can be simplified -- V333T Dec 04, 2025 at 06:18 PM ET

V333T • 12/04/25 06:18 PM ET

Assuming you want to keep the “returning” 22 players. -- SunDevilHokie Dec 04, 2025 at 07:10 PM ET

SunDevilHokie • 12/04/25 07:10 PM ET

And what about funding returning players?** ◄ -- Pylons Dec 04, 2025 at 06:23 PM ET

Pylons • 12/04/25 06:23 PM ET

"All other things the same" -- V333T Dec 04, 2025 at 06:28 PM ET

V333T • 12/04/25 06:28 PM ET

That's an efficient contradiction.** -- Pylons Dec 04, 2025 at 07:32 PM ET

Pylons • 12/04/25 07:32 PM ET

My head just exploded** -- Coattail Hokie Dec 04, 2025 at 05:57 PM ET

Coattail Hokie • 12/04/25 05:57 PM ET

Yeah, I pick team 22 but may be wrong ** -- coshokie Dec 04, 2025 at 06:06 PM ET

coshokie • 12/04/25 06:06 PM ET

Each has a downside. It's a catch-22.** -- KCHokie2 Dec 04, 2025 at 06:09 PM ET

KCHokie2 • 12/04/25 06:09 PM ET