Login | Sign Up
TechSideline

All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by First Bank & Trust Company

Football Board
◀ ▶
JoesterVT
Joined: 10/21/2005
Posts: 50,561
Likes: 22,534
JoesterVT

this is a bizarre take.

Posted: 09/30/2024 at 12:37 PM ET
(In response to this post by BG Hokie)

Thread Replies (33)

Full Thread →
So.....Whit Does NOTHING about the Miami Theft
vtchem75 • 09/30/24 10:37 AM ET
Nothing he can do that changes what happened except ask for replay rule chg
Hokester • 10/01/24 08:31 AM ET
Because Jim Weaver would have? The nail that sticks out gets hammered down
soflahokie • 09/30/24 01:59 PM ET
Zen wa isoge. Strike while the iron is hot. He needs to dress them down now**
likehokies • 09/30/24 02:03 PM ET
What's he supposed to do?**
hoosnowahokie • 09/30/24 12:50 PM ET
Are you sure?
Midwestguy • 09/30/24 12:23 PM ET
Nothing public, no.**
Stech • 09/30/24 12:21 PM ET
after I heard about Whit's reputation.. nothing will be done
1947Sunbowl • 09/30/24 01:31 PM ET
Why do they think we got robbed? We're clinging to the not indisputable
BG Hokie • 09/30/24 11:31 AM ET
Felton had possession of the ball, was on the ground and in bounds
83hokieee • 10/01/24 10:42 AM ET
It was ruled a catch on the field. There was no indisputable evidence...
GSOHokie01 • 09/30/24 09:02 PM ET
I’m not sure what game you were watching **
ombandit • 09/30/24 06:02 PM ET
If you didn’t think that was a catch you must be writing the rules of catch
hokiepro • 09/30/24 05:51 PM ET
it shouldn't have been reversed, no matter what the call was. If they
reestuart • 09/30/24 04:29 PM ET
The argument of fans believing it was a catch…
WhoDatVT • 09/30/24 02:47 PM ET
It was a catch...
Windows NT • 09/30/24 01:00 PM ET
You do realize you have to control a catch to the ground, right?**
NokieHokie • 09/30/24 03:48 PM ET
the back judge thinks so.
Windows NT • 09/30/24 04:18 PM ET
Showing a still picture proves absolutely nothing.**
Jeffroww • 09/30/24 02:12 PM ET
Even in that clear picture, it’s a tangle of multiple hands & arms
Route460 • 09/30/24 01:42 PM ET
this is a bizarre take.** ◄
JoesterVT • 09/30/24 12:37 PM ET
Ref was the only one with a decent viewpoint disagrees, indisputable rule
Stech • 09/30/24 12:34 PM ET
You think you had a........
2hhoop3 • 09/30/24 12:32 PM ET
Bingo, all they have to do is release a video view of their call, where is
Stech • 09/30/24 12:37 PM ET
Sure looked like a catch to me.
GCHokieof91 • 09/30/24 12:12 PM ET
How you could glean to that from the available replays is...puzzling.
marcbvtgm • 09/30/24 11:42 AM ET
Maybe so, but at the least it should have been a penalty...
BamBam • 09/30/24 11:38 AM ET
that's not a penalty
JoesterVT • 09/30/24 01:45 PM ET
conference provides vt services and if not the member demands equal
1947Sunbowl • 09/30/24 11:09 AM ET
You really think......
2hhoop3 • 09/30/24 11:37 AM ET
We'll get nothing from the ACC independent of the action or inaction by WB**
Tuckahokie • 09/30/24 11:08 AM ET
We'll get nothing, and like it!**
AggHokie • 09/30/24 01:07 PM ET
Who cares? Changes nothing. It sucked, but there is no remedy.**
Techsupport • 09/30/24 11:05 AM ET
Any calls he makes will be through private channels.
EDGEMAN • 09/30/24 11:02 AM ET