Coaches yes; quality players not so sure

Football Board

Post #1270775 ◀ PREV NEXT ▶

Joined: 01/10/2012

Posts: 988

Likes: 1,583

Spider73

Posted: 05/22/2025 at 12:23 PM ET

(In response to this post by HokieAl)

Do you think VT spends enough on football coaches? -- HokieAl May 21, 2025 at 10:47 PM ET

HokieAl • 05/21/25 10:47 PM ET

Avg coaches win with great players. Great coaches lose with avg players -- Techsupport May 28, 2025 at 04:41 PM ET

Techsupport • 05/28/25 04:41 PM ET

I'd say they spend too much... -- MP4VT2004 May 22, 2025 at 02:33 PM ET

MP4VT2004 • 05/22/25 02:33 PM ET

And overpaying based on experience and resume of the recently moved on IMO** -- Tombo May 22, 2025 at 11:35 PM ET

Tombo • 05/22/25 11:35 PM ET

Not enough information to conclude one way or another. Did we lose out on -- BG Hokie May 22, 2025 at 01:01 PM ET

BG Hokie • 05/22/25 01:01 PM ET

Coaches yes; quality players not so sure** ◄ -- Spider73 May 22, 2025 at 12:23 PM ET

Spider73 • 05/22/25 12:23 PM ET

What it does show we are paying more than ever for average results. ** -- GSOHokie01 May 22, 2025 at 10:50 AM ET

GSOHokie01 • 05/22/25 10:50 AM ET

Yes, VT is now paying more than ever for football coaches (as is everyone)** -- HokieAl May 22, 2025 at 11:26 AM ET

HokieAl • 05/22/25 11:26 AM ET

My guess is vs the entire ACC, we'd see VT is paying avg $ for avg results -- marcbvtgm May 22, 2025 at 11:10 AM ET

marcbvtgm • 05/22/25 11:10 AM ET

What's your proposal? Do we reroute NIL funding to pay coaches more?** -- EDGEMAN May 22, 2025 at 06:21 AM ET

EDGEMAN • 05/22/25 06:21 AM ET

…eliminate most coaches and let the employee players call plays -- chumley May 23, 2025 at 12:10 PM ET

chumley • 05/23/25 12:10 PM ET

First step is awareness of the situation -- HokieAl May 22, 2025 at 07:47 AM ET

HokieAl • 05/22/25 07:47 AM ET